[sinkspur]

Cheny: "We can make sexual orientation a nonissue* for the Republican Party.

Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP.

[Kevin Curry]

Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP.

It was until gay activists made it an issue.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP.

Right, the GOP should not recognize a behavioral pathology in any plank of their platform other than for reparation and treatment.

[Sonny M]

Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP.

Out of curiosity, outside of economic issues, what would the difference then be, between the GOP and the democratic party? Abortion and thats it I assume?

[longtermmemmory]

Cheny: "We can make sexual orientation a nonissue* for the Republican Party.
Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP.
*** * * * * *

the non issue should be the homosexual lifestyle is wrong and should be taught to children as an undesireable lifestyle choice. The non-issue must be that children must be taught homosexuality is wrong.

[nmh]

"Sexual orientation should be a non-issue for the GOP."

Maybe for you, a RHINO, it isn't an issue however for Biblical based Republicans, such as myself, homosexuality is unacceptable. We don't believe in having an benign eye to clinton and his sexual escapades nor is it proper to have a blind eye on same sex attraction. In either situation this is unacceptable and their judgment is not trustable.

I'm suprised that you as a Catholic are still defending homosexuality. Most Catholics I know have NO time for homosexuality in the pulpit or in an "honary" position.