Skip to comments.
Mary Cheney ducks out of GOP gay group
Advocate ^
| June 2, 2003
| Advocate
Posted on 06/02/2003 9:04:07 PM PDT by Mister Magoo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: sinkspur
Or from dimwits, as your vote in 2000 attested.Name calling after only 18 posts? That must be a new record for you sink? Thanks for not disappointing.
To: Clint N. Suhks
Either way, like for drug addicts, we should offer them help if they seek it. Most don't.
Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of.
22
posted on
06/02/2003 10:37:28 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Clint N. Suhks
Name calling after only 18 posts? Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.
I figured one shot was worth another.
23
posted on
06/02/2003 10:39:45 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Homosexuality is not against the law in 37 states; in those where the practice of it is, the laws are not enforced. Drug usage is against the law in every state that I know of. So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment
To: sinkspur
Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics?
To: Clint N. Suhks
So what does that have to do with whether they need trestment or not? NOTHING. Both are worthy treatment Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.
26
posted on
06/02/2003 10:42:28 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Sonny M
...outside of economic issues, what would the difference then be, between the GOP and the democratic party? Abortion and thats it I assume?The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...
27
posted on
06/02/2003 10:42:48 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: Mister Magoo
After seeing a series of stories in the media lately about gays and the GOP, I'm of the opinion that a lot of people in the media yearn for the old days of the GOP eating their own, and are liking to stir the pot a little and see what might be cooking.
28
posted on
06/02/2003 10:42:56 PM PDT
by
SoDak
To: Clint N. Suhks
What evidence is needed more that probability and statistics? Probability and statistics are not evidence.
Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.
29
posted on
06/02/2003 10:44:20 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Drug treatment works; treatment to "cure" gays doesn't.What was that about the dimwit with no evidence?
To: Clint N. Suhks
Cite your evidence of large numbers of gays turning straight.
31
posted on
06/02/2003 10:45:58 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Probability and statistics are not evidence. Cite the "evidence" that incestuals support Bush.Bunk! Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit.
To: Sonny M
bump
33
posted on
06/02/2003 10:48:01 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: Consort
The GOP overall supports Guns, vouchers, a sensible environmental policy, support for the military and national security, pro tax reform, respect for religion, pro scouting, pro tort reform, conservative judiciary, pro law and order, pro life, pro individual responsibility,...At least 4 if not 5 of the above, would directly conflict with the gay agenda and homosexuals would be strongly opposed to at least most of this in general, yet orientation shouldn't matter?
How does one say pro-scouting, respect for religion and vouchers, support for the military, and then say sexual orientation doesn't matter
34
posted on
06/02/2003 10:49:40 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Clint N. Suhks
Probability and statistics for a population this large is proof enough for even the dimest wit. So, cite them.
35
posted on
06/02/2003 10:50:46 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia.
To: Clint N. Suhks
I didn't say "large" numbers of gays change you did, it depends on their willingness to change. I understand it's similar to the success rate of curing Schizophrenia. Which is, de minimis.
37
posted on
06/02/2003 10:52:53 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
So, cite them.If Incestuals are .1% of the voting population then it's likely that Bush got 50,000 votes.
To: sinkspur
Which is, de minimis. Not to those who want to change, you have no heart.
To: sinkspur
Actually, you started it by claiming that Bush accepts votes from incestuals, with no evidence.With all due respect, 50 million people voted for Bush, I doubt every single one of them was a solid person. For gods sake, I know people who voted for Nader in 1996, voted for Bush in 2000, and are thinking of voting Nader again, because they can't even tell the difference between the two.
40
posted on
06/02/2003 11:00:08 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson