[Luis Gonzalez]

I don't understand the need for a refutation of this.

There is no question that Iraq had WMD's, we had proof of their existence in 1991.

According to the terms of the cease-fire, Iraq was supposed to destroy all chemical and biological weapons in its possession. The Iraqi government has been unable (or unwilling) to provide any record or evidence documenting their compliance.

Everything has an ending, and after so many years of waiting, the time of waiting ended, and the time of war began.

[Howlin]

I meant to our "liberal" friends, the ones attacking Bush right now.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

I see twofold out of this:

1) That the liberals are lying again, when they fault Bush's decision to liberate Iraq, and

2) What Clinton's real goal was on the eve of his impeachment, considering his ineffectiveness and ignorant approach to randomly dropping bombs on Iraq.

Did Clinton think Saddams regime would just give up by getting lobbed a few bombs? I think we saw the truth in Iraqi Freedom.

[Wolfstar]

Luis, two Senate committees are preparing some kind of joint "investigation" into why no WMD have been found to date in Iraq. Sen. John Warner, a Republican and chairman of one of the committees involved, has already huffed and puffed about how "America's credibility is at stake." My outrage over this development knows no bounds, because such hearings are the Democrats fondest wet dream of the moment.