Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homeowners taking out 10-year mortgages
Wall Street Journal ^ | June 2, 2003 | RUTH SIMON

Posted on 06/02/2003 4:23:28 PM PDT by Dog Gone

With mortgage rates setting new lows last week, a growing number of homeowners are doing something that was largely unheard of just a year ago: taking out 10-year mortgages.

It's part of a broader push by many borrowers to pay off their mortgages quickly by taking advantage of the lowest interest rates in more than 40 years. Some are baby boomers who want to get rid of their debt before they retire. Others are simply trying to save on interest costs by shortening their mortgages.

The interest savings on a 10-year mortgage are enormous. If someone borrowed $250,000 at 4.5 percent, the going rate at a major lender, the interest over the life of the loan would be only $60,915. By contrast, in the case of a homeowner borrowing that same amount for 30 years at 5.375 percent (longer-term loans typically carry higher rates), the interest would total $253,974.

The drawback, of course, is that your payments are higher in the short term. On that same hypothetical $250,000, the monthly payments would be $2,591 with a 10-year loan, compared with $1,400 for the 30-year loan.

At Countrywide Home Loans, a unit of Countrywide Financial Corp., 10-year mortgages now account for roughly 15 percent of mortgage loans. The volume of 10-year loans "was insignificant a year ago," says Doug Perry, first vice president of Countrywide Home Loans.

To spur demand, Countrywide has been sending direct-mail solicitations explaining the benefits of shorter loans to borrowers who are prepaying their existing longer-term mortgages.

Borrowers have been gravitating to 15-year mortgages from 30-year loans for some time. But the new 10-year loans are providing a fresh inducement even for people who have refinanced relatively recently.

Rich Schroeder, an account manager for a transportation company, took out a 15-year mortgage with a 6.5 percent rate last year. Now, he is switching into a 10-year, $116,000 mortgage with a 4.875 percent rate.

"I'm looking to get out from underneath the mortgage as quickly as possible," says Schroeder, who lives outside Detroit. The new loan will allow Schroeder to pay off his loan nearly four years earlier, while adding only $100 to his monthly payment. Schroeder says he considered refinancing four or five months ago, "but it wasn't worth making a move."

Earlier this year, the mortgage industry braced itself for a sharp decline in refinancing activity as the economy seemed poised to recover, which would drive rates up. Instead, the economy has remained soft, and fears of deflation have pushed rates to their lowest levels in decades.

The result is that refinancing activity is surging. The Mortgage Bankers Association recently boosted its estimate of 2003 mortgage volume to $3 trillion, up from last year's record $2.5 trillion.

Interest in the shorter loans is helping spur the latest round of refinancing. In April, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage introduced a 10-year fixed-rate mortgage that carries a lower rate than its 15-year mortgage; previously, the two mortgages carried the same rate.

"Our phone literally has been ringing off the hook," says Dan Arrigoni, president of U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a unit of U.S. Bancorp.

Shorter-term mortgages of all types are gaining ground. At GMAC Home Finance, a unit of General Motors Corp., 15-year mortgages accounted for nearly half of recent refinance loans. Last year, about 20 percent of GMAC customers who refinanced opted for a 15-year mortgage. Chase Home Finance, a unit of J.P. Morgan Chase, says 15-year mortgages now account for about 20 percent of the loans in its pipeline, up from 15 percent six months ago. More borrowers also are refinancing their 30-year mortgages into 20-year and 25-year loans, lenders say.

On Tuesday, rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 5.51 percent, while 15-year fixed-rate loans averaged 4.95 percent, according to HSH Associates, financial publishers in Butler, N.J.

Mortgage rates could drop even further if the economy shows further signs of weakness. Mortgage rates typically track rates on Treasury bonds.

Of course, many homeowners aren't interested in shorter mortgages. Instead, they are using the low rates to lower their monthly payments. Or, they are taking cash out when they get a new mortgage.

Indeed, short-term mortgages aren't for everybody. Borrowers are committing to a higher payment for the life of the loan. If a homeowner's income drops, she will still have to make that steeper payment.

You can achieve some of the same benefits of shorter-term mortgage simply by taking out a 30-year mortgage and making extra principal payments. Pinched for cash? Make the minimum payment. One hitch: You typically won't get as low a rate on a 30-year mortgage as on a shorter-term loan. And many find it hard to stick with this self-imposed mortgage prepayment strategy.

In addition, people taking out a 10-year mortgage will quickly whittle away one of their biggest tax breaks: the deduction for mortgage interest. Principal payments aren't tax deductible. In the first year, the interest deduction for a 10-year mortgage at 4.5 percent is only about a fifth smaller than a 30-year mortgage at 5.375 percent. But by the fifth year, a borrower in the 27 percent bracket would see the deduction cut almost in half, calculates PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Borrowers don't always get a break for taking a shorter-term mortgage. Twenty-five-year loans are typically priced at the same rate as 30-year mortgages. Likewise, Bank of America Corp. offers the same rate on 10-year and 15-year loans. As a result, the bank says its customers are more likely to take out a 15-year mortgage and pay it off early if they are inclined.

Still, for many borrowers, a shorter-term loan has clear benefits. It allows homeowners who are several years into their current mortgage to take advantage of low rates without stretching out payments for another 15 or 30 years.

Don Genereux, an elementary school principal in Minneapolis, is replacing his $88,000 fixed-rate mortgage, a $25,000 home equity loan and some high-cost debt with a new $115,000, 10-year fixed-rate mortgage with a 4.375 percent rate. The new loan will boost Genereux's monthly mortgage payment by about $15 but cut his total borrowing costs by about $500 a month. Genereux, 55 years old, says he was already five years into his 15-year mortgage and didn't want to extend his loan further. "We're looking at retirement and change of career," he says. "We need to have a light at the end of the tunnel."


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: mortgagerates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last
To: Texas Eagle
That financial advisor is a little bit impersonal IMO.

I understand the concept of having other assets than your home, but all things being equal, having your home paid off is a great feeling and I don't buy that your home "is just a place to live".

Ideally, you would have other assets as well as own your home outright.
21 posted on 06/02/2003 5:14:36 PM PDT by NV_Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
Well, I ran the numbers, and I'd save almost $100,000 if I go to a 10-year note at 4.5%. However, it would cost me about $400 more per month.

That's a little less than $5,000 per year. Kinda thinking out loud as I'm typing, that's paying $50,000 early over 10 years to save $100,000, or a 200% return on my investment. Annualized, that's 20%, something which I never got during the stock market boom of the late 90s.

I realize that there is a present value component to that which I'm not considering (i.e., $400 today is worth WAY more than $400 ten years from now), but since the same is true about interest savings, maybe it's a wash. I'll have to think about that, or maybe someone can enlighten me.

22 posted on 06/02/2003 5:18:18 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Do it tomorrow. You're spending more than two or three nice steak dinners each month for the extra interest.
23 posted on 06/02/2003 5:22:11 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Do it! I bought my house on a 15 year note and it'll be paid off 3 years before I retire. That'll allow me 3 years of savings to make sure I can have the roof redone, replace the A/C, and possibly rewire. Ought to make for a relatively worry free retirement.
24 posted on 06/02/2003 5:23:05 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes and no. My disposable income goes down because my monthly payments go up. But at the end of 10 years, I can have a steak dinner every night.
25 posted on 06/02/2003 5:24:56 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NV_Chuck
Owning your own house is financial freedom (provided you don't have credit card or auto debt). If I had my mortage paid off in full, I wouldn't be worried about layoffs anymore. I could take a job at much lower pay and still meet expenses. Or I could sell my house and buy a double-wide trailer in Alabama (like my parents did), a pick-up truck and still have enough left over to be set for life.
26 posted on 06/02/2003 5:25:12 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 260 (-30))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Make sure to figure not just your interest and cashflow savings.

Remember, you are resetting your amortization clock - the early years of a mortgage are mostly interest - you may just be throwing away all the payments you have already made.

Each case is different.
27 posted on 06/02/2003 5:29:03 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Oh, and one more thing. Make sure not to over-leverage.

If the real estate market goes down, you could get caught with negative equity.
28 posted on 06/02/2003 5:31:02 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
get to your mortgage company now...no time or money to waste!
29 posted on 06/02/2003 5:31:18 PM PDT by oust the louse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
I dont think I'll Listen to rick edelman...Im no financial genious but if the over all cost of financing a home is 250,000.00 less and you have full equity in half the time, it seems to me that you are better off.

But I agree with NY_Chuck that you may not want to pay a mortgage early if the extra liquid money you have as a result can be used to get YOU 12% return on an investment while you pay on a 5% mortgage...You are up 7%

30 posted on 06/02/2003 5:32:01 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions, $1.00 Todays Special: Half Baked, 50 cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
Our plan here is somewhat different...we're going to take those 15 years to use the shorter time to build up good equity in the house...say over the next 10 years. After that, its retirement time (I can collect my pension at 50 years old), move out of the city, buy a nice house down south in the country, and settle in. Of course, gettign another job is definately in the plan.
31 posted on 06/02/2003 5:32:03 PM PDT by FreeperinRATcage (Tell CNN: NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
"I wonder what Rick's problem is? If a person pays only the required monthly payment on a 30 year mortgage, at the end of that 30 years, he will have paid at least double the selling price."

That's the time value of money. Take the difference in the payment and invest it each month. You will come out ahead, and have the option to pay off the mortgage with the nest egg when the house would have been paid off with the accelerated payments. When interest rates rise, your investment return can increase, while your payment stays low. Also, you should avoid holding too much equity in your home, for asset protection purposes.

Here's Ric's explanation:

http://www.ricedelman.com/planning/home/rule21.asp

32 posted on 06/02/2003 5:34:13 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Remember, you are resetting your amortization clock - the early years of a mortgage are mostly interest - you may just be throwing away all the payments you have already made.

Not with a 10-year mortgage.

Hypothetical example: $100,000 loan, 4.5% interest, 10 year term:

The first payment is $1,036.38, $375 in interest, $661.48 in principal.

33 posted on 06/02/2003 5:35:49 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
I agree. It's best to have the low monthly payment of a 30 year and just prepay it if you have the extra dough. At least then, if you hit a rough spot, you're not stuck with a killer high monthly payment.
34 posted on 06/02/2003 5:39:49 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mylife
I think NY Chuck's point is something similar to what Rick Edelman was saying.

Perhaps I misrepresented his point, but he was making the case for a general situation and he laid out his argument in great detail(I'd do it if I had the time..might do it anyway lol) as to why most people should get a 30 year mortgage and invest wisely with the money.

Also, with that plan you are making the same payments all the way through, and while your wealth is building those payments will take up less and less of your money. On top of that, investments undertaken with the money you aren't using on the mortgage each month will earn you 8-12 percent meaning you can have between 500K to 2 million(depending on what your specifics) at the end of that 30 years.

On top of THAT, inflation means that the payments you're making in years 15-30 will actually be significantly less than you would if you pay it off in 10 years. And once again, all the other money you have for investments because you aren't spending your last dimes on mortgage or mortgage-related financial crunches.
35 posted on 06/02/2003 5:44:06 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Thanks Beelzebubba. I was actually going to spend time typing out his arguments. lol
36 posted on 06/02/2003 5:45:29 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
After Reading Edelmans column, I agree and therefore agree with Edelman. DOH
37 posted on 06/02/2003 5:47:58 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions, $1.00 Todays Special: Half Baked, 50 cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
That's yet ANOTHER aspect. If you DO hit rough spots, a huge monthly IS going to get your house taken from you.
38 posted on 06/02/2003 5:50:44 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: mlmr
"15 yr loan at 4.75%..."

Where did you find that rate? I am shopping around. Sounds good!

40 posted on 06/02/2003 5:55:20 PM PDT by Mary-Bayou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson