Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bootless
but boot Savage did mention that ENRON boys got scott free how do you justify that? HOw about the Clintons real Estate dealings? Beast is right One rule for the President another for the resident
303 posted on 06/06/2003 4:52:51 PM PDT by ruready4eternity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: ruready4eternity
but boot Savage did mention that ENRON boys got scott free how do you justify that? HOw about the Clintons real Estate dealings? Beast is right One rule for the President another for the resident

I heard him mention that briefly before I had to get out of the car. And no, I don't believe any of them should have gotten off scot-free. So, yes, same rules for both. But because the Enron guys got off doesn't mean it's OK that Martha did. Anyway, she's an old stock broker - she knew better...

308 posted on 06/06/2003 4:57:19 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

To: ruready4eternity
The Enron case is just taking a long time to get everything together before they can proceed. I live in Texas and was in Houston when the collapse took place. Enron had entities in many states and many countries. It's not like all the info for the case is in one place and they can start a trial within at a moments notice. Ken Lay will do time.
309 posted on 06/06/2003 4:58:01 PM PDT by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson