[general_re]

Well, since utility is a matter for objectivity, can you relate instances?

Is knowing why mitochondria have their own DNA better than remaining ignorant about the matter?

I'm talking about Darwinism the ideology masquerading as science, not intellectually honest engagement to actually ascertain what we can make of the various elements of evolution and creation theories.)

Your turn - got any specific instances of what you wish to dispute here?

[unspun]

Is knowing why mitochondria have their own DNA better than remaining ignorant about the matter?

And this is something we wouldn't have learned from an honest investigation of life sciences? How does the attempt to obviate God by overextending what we may imagine and/or research of evolution provide unique impetus for the research you cite?

I'm talking about Darwinism the ideology masquerading as science, not intellectually honest engagement to actually ascertain what we can make of the various elements of evolution and creation theories.

Pinging a few others, due to my limits of knowledge of cellular biology.