Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
How would this be different from hidden variables?

"Hidden Variable" is a loaded term, so I can't say much about it without a context. What I am referring to is a bit different than the "hidden variable" concept normally applied to QM. In the case I am talking about there is no "hidden" function per se, rather we are viewing the function directly but are modeling it conceptually with stochastic methods rather than discrete deterministic ones. Actually, this is what usually happens if you model any closed finite state process by sampling its state, so this is not surprising. Unfortunately, our measuring/sampling tools are pretty coarse which affects the resolution of the analysis, though this has been getting better with time. With much higher resolution data we might be able to infer or properly guess the deterministic function, but until then we are stuck with stochastic functions and sampling.

271 posted on 06/06/2003 10:08:38 AM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Actually, this is what usually happens if you model any closed finite state process by sampling its state, so this is not surprising.

I would add that the fact it can be modeled this way at all suggests that the function is very, very simple. These type of analysis doesn't scale well at all with function complexity.

273 posted on 06/06/2003 10:12:58 AM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson