I can't stand all the racists and others on this thread that are giving DUers and other detractors ammo to shoot at FR with by saying/implying that loud music is justification for multiple murders. If you can't see how ridiculous that argument is, then you are blind.
By the way, I'll post where I please. If you don't like me posting responses to you, hopefully you won't try to murder me because you're annoyed, like the killer you're defending.
I don't give a damn what you can't stand.
Look, I don't like a lot of things, like liberals, religious fanatics, gay people, illegal aliens etc etc, but I don't suggest that anyone who posts in their favor be banned and I don't run to administrative moderator and cry about it like you did to the other poster. You are a cry baby.
People that do that make me gag. A real homeowners association type.
I can't stand people that run to authority at the drop of a hat because they may not like something that was said. You must be very afraid of real life, as it's a lot more brutal than anything that may be said here.
Why is it 'racist'? There are many, many people on the "annoying end of the gene pool" who are white, you know. If the poster used that exact same phrase, and the relevers in question were white, would you still accuse him of 'racism'? The "annoying end of the gene pool" he was referring to are people who are completely inconsiderate of others. In this case, they just happen to be Latino.
Apparently you assume that loud music players belong to a particular race? And therefore their "elimination" must be a racist comment. My observation is that inconsiderate people belong to all races and genders. It was merely an attempt at satire.
Remember how Jonathan Swift wrote a "Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public" in 1729? He suggested that the Irish, suffering from dire poverty under racist English rule, should eat their young to neatly banish both starvation and overpopulation. Of course my attempt at satire is not up to his level, but I think issuing hunting licenses to thin out the herd of lawyers and politicians should be duly considered. And yes, ":-)" should be a big hint it was satire (or sarcasm).