To: RGSpincich; WellsFargo
162 posted on
06/02/2003 12:16:30 PM PDT by
MaggieMay
(A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
To: MaggieMay
Thanks for the ping! Wow, hopefully the prosecution is all over this info. Further proof that Geragos and Peterson's are utterly stupid. If they hadn't made such a public spectacle of these items then we wouldn't have figured this out. Has anyone pinged Fox news regarding these irregularities?
To: MaggieMay
You know, I bet they got that information from Scott.
168 posted on
06/02/2003 12:30:21 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: MaggieMay
Thanks for the info, Maggie! If that info was supplied to FBI by SP, then it looks bad for him. Of course, he will say something like "well, I thought she was wearing them, but later I found them. She did mention her fingers were swollen, but I didn't know she took them off".
To: MaggieMay
Thanks Maggie. Notice mention of a scar on the abdomen. Wonder if that previous opening is the one that was mentioned in the leaked autopsy reports. "Evidence of an incision..."
To: MaggieMay
Hmm, now I see from your 162 that she wasn't wearing a watch, but a diamond necklace.
To: MaggieMay
Thanks MaggieMay. You would also think, given the fact that Amy saw her Monday night, 12/23, the diamond ring was on her finger that night. So, one of two things are going to happen now. Either Scott was really stupid and did take the jewelry to have something made "suddenly" on 12/24 (yeah, right) or he hocked them for something/someone else.
OR, they are now going to claim that the Rochas took them, as they can no longer be located. Anyone want to take bets?
Since there no jewelry to be found, either the police confiscated it in the searches, or Scott cleared it out for cash.jmo
277 posted on
06/02/2003 5:28:49 PM PDT by
Rusty Roberts
(RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson