Final Note
This document is incomplete. There are obviously a lot of issues and details I have left out, not because I don't believe they are important, but because I was trying to keep this down to a reasonable length. Any and all suggestions are welcome, even from people like my pal BChan and his fretard friends, who think they're the only people in the world. To them, I say, laugh while you can, boys, your fifteen minutes are almost up.
Okay gang. Let him know what you think.
How is it that this drip has it twisted?
As such, it represents a direct threat to the Constitution of the United States.
Furthermore, anyone seriously advancing the idea of a global government should either be arrested for sedition (if a US citizen) or deported immediately.
If the treasonous bastards still want to attempt to implement their global tyranny, they should be aware of the fact that there are millions of Americans who literally spend every waking hour plotting their demise if they ever bring in foreign troops.
Corporate PAC's are illegal(at least in my state).
Change the party primary system so that it doesn't favor the candidate with the most money.
In a state rep race in my county, the candidate with the most money lost, and 2nd least amound won. How are you going to do that anyway?
Restructure the campaign finance laws so that good people aren't deterred from running for office because of the need to raise such vast sums of money,
Many don't run because it's a paycut from their current job. Besides, that ain't going to happen.
and so that our public officials can spend less time raising funds and more time doing their jobs as legislators.
How many reps have 90%+ voting attendance recores?
Roll back the de-regulation of the media so that people with a vision that doesn't conform to the corporate worldview have access to a means to communicate it.
I'm going to say this VERY clearly. Corporate doesn't mean Republican you stupid DMF's. Hollywood is corporate. There is as much diverse views among corporations as there is among people.
The Republican leadership thrives, not because their vision is better than ours, but because their wealth allows them to broadcast their message louder and to drown out anyone who stands against them.
Jon Corzine? Warren Buffet? Rockefellers? Ted Turner? Gerry Levin? Michael Eisner? C'mon. This is ridiculous. The GOP wins, since out there in REAL America, we see how RIDICULOUS your views are. We don't like gun grabbing, govt censors(like your PC universities), health Nazis, America haters, and the like forcing your crap down our throat and we're finally getting up and kicking your sorry asses to the curb.
Take away that advantage, force them to play on our playing field, the field of ideas, and they will lose every time
If it's equal up, bring it. You're not even in my league, son.
There is no second place in politics. Win first, do everything else afterwards.
About the only thing I agree with.
If they're really fascists, they'll kill us all, and the rest of the world will deal with them in time. If they're not, we can defeat them and treat them magnamimously, just to show them the real difference between "us" and "them." Either way, they'll eventually be tossed into the trash heap of history where they belong, alongside everyone else with delusions of power
I won't give up my freedoms. There are three boxes. The Soap Box, ballot box, and cartridge box. We also know the difference. That's why we kicked you out in 94, 98(Michigan), 2000(National), and 02. As for fascists, I see them. That's you. I don't want government in every aspect of my life.
A global government needs legitimacy, and it needs the military power to enforce the laws it creates. The UN as it stands is not prepared for this.
I did not, do not, and never will recognize any global government. Period.
It must be a government that represents the will of the majority but which respects the rights of the minority, that guarantees the freedom of speech, religion, and press.
Like your Fairness Doctrine on press, 9th circuit on religion, and your universities on freedom of speech? Where's the 2nd Amendment there? IF there is no 2nd Amendment, than your rights talk is just that. Talk.
The next most important duty for the UN is the formation of a global peacekeeping force, a single military. This can be drawn from all of the countries governed by the UN, and can be used both to enforce the laws of the UN and to prevent wars from breaking out
Bwahahahhahahahhahahaahahhahahaha.
The decisions of any legislature must be ratified on the battlefield
So you support war for this world govt?
No government can survive long if it is founded on deceit, nor can it survive if it isn't trusted
And larger governments have more deceit and more power. If I don't like the government of Michigan, I can move to Montana. I can't move from a world government.
1. The state shall grant...
The state doesn't grant me anything. Look up John Locke.
That's as far as I got.......
Comparing Ayn Rand to Hitler makes no sense at all
Defense agaisnt whom? Space aliens. What a marroon.
ARRRGGHHHH!!!!!!! The "..resources of the world..." are NOT "dwindling". They are, in fact, increasing virtually everywhere. This is an economic FACT, and was proven year ago with the bet between a famous economist (whose name escapes me at the moment), and Paul Ehrlich (author of the Malthusian tome "The Population Bomb").
The problem with the "...resources of the world..." is inequity of distribution--typically caused by authoritarion socialist governments (cf Zimbabwe, Cuba, North Korea, and virtually everywhere else that there is extreme poverty).
In other words, liberals (socialists) and their Pox Liberalis are the CAUSE of the disease, not the cure.
Hitler is still on the left.
True socialists divide the people into classes. The vast majority would be in the worker class or worker/consumer class if consuming is in fact the work of today. There might be a middle class, but of course everything possible is being done even now to eliminate the inconvenient middle class. Then there is the elite class. The elite are the only ones who have the brains and education to know what is really going on, they rule, and only they have true human freedom. The worker/consumer class is kept happy and busy with consumer goods and meds and phony war. They aren't overly bright nor are they encouraged to get other than the standardized education. The elite are the most likely source of revolutionary ideas and fervor as they compete amongst themselves. The workers are not trusted even to make the cars nor grow the food for the elite: all phases of production are mechanized. Post-industrial age? Not hardly.
By the way, the phony war is being moved to Africa. The Middle East is just a temporary diversion. Africa is already as good as in the western camp right now. Eurasia and Eastasia have been skunked.
Our socialist system appears to be winning everything simply by being the superior form of socialism--unwitting socialism.
Ask any Liberal. That's pretty much the socialist plan.
Rand/Hitler?? Rand was a proponent of individualism. Hitler was not. Simply put, there is no connection here.
LOL, I got this far and knew that whatever follows is worthless.
It's nice to find out early, before too much time is wasted.
See you around,
LH
Oh my! The "enemies of freedom" who wrote the constitution and the bill of right's to limit the kind of federal involvement this wanker advocates are back "in command now"
I suppose someone dug them up?
PS: You can tell this guy is a certified know-nothing because his page is filled to the gills with every gaudy, tacky, ridiculous bell and whistle conceiveable.
It looks like Hawaian shirt and moves like gear oil at the south pole.
He's also desperate for attention, as he included half the dictionary in the page title in the hope fooling someone into giving him a hit.
I'm betting he is in his 20's and a recent graduate of a very liberal university. He writes like the Manchurian Candidate who has had "the truth" pounded into his head so well that he really can't think for himself.
Ayn Rand and Hitler is just the easiest example of his totally screwed up view of life and politics. Nazi = National Socialist German Worker's Party. I don't associate socialist movements with the right wing but the libs have been trying to make us believe this for 60 years. The Nazis were socialists and instituted a typical totalitarian socialist government. How do you possibly connect the dots between that approach to Government and the philosophy of a woman who's lifetime goal was the destruction of totalitarianism?