This latest headline grabbing story about the tax cuts excluding lower-income taxpayers was discussed by Rush Friday.
As he put it, Voionivich and Co. were the ones insistent that the total "cost" not exceed $350b. 'W' would have been happy to include those lower-income taxpayers, but they chose to draw the line somwhere.
Anyone know more about this?
37 posted on 06/01/2003 8:05:03 AM PDT by chiller
(could be wrong, but doubt it)