Posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:50 AM PDT by runningbear
Laci Peterson's brother Brent Rocha loads a rocking chair from her Modesto home into the back of a truck Friday morning.
Laci's things in tug of war
By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITERS
Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:10 AM PDT
Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house on Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.
Police responded to the Covena Avenue home at about 10 a.m. after a security company reported that the alarm had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.
Officers determined that Laci Peterson's family and friends were removing items that belonged to Laci, said Savelli, who added that officers documented what was taken.
"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the Police Department that this was not a burglary.
Peterson's husband, Scott, 30, has been charged with double murder and faces the death penalty in the killings of his 27-year-old wife and their unborn son, Conner.
Savelli said the fallout from Friday's property removal "was best handled between the families and their attorneys."
Adam Stewart, an attorney for Laci Peterson's family, said the family had been in contact with Scott Peterson's defense team, who had agreed to allow Laci's mother, Sharon Rocha, to go through the house on Tuesday. She was to be accompanied by representatives of the defense team, and all items taken were to be photographed and videotaped.
Scott Peterson's parents and lawyers expressed outrage that the Rochas did not follow the agreement.
Jackie Peterson said the people who went into the home Friday had "absolutely no permission to be in that house. I have a lot of empathy for Sharon, but she does not have a right to go in our house and take what she wants."
Rocha did not appear to be among the packers. Calls placed to the Rocha home were not accepted.
Seven vehicles loaded
Among the items loaded into seven vehicles were a crib, a rocking chair and a box with Graco printed on the outside. Graco makes such products as strollers, highchairs and car seats.
Laci Peterson's family announced Wednesday that it had hired attorneys to help recover items from the house. A list included her wedding dress, jewelry and Conner's crib.
Jackie Peterson told The Bee that the security company notified her by telephone in San Diego County that the house alarm had been tripped.
The property removal appeared to take Scott Peterson's defense team by surprise.
Matthew Dalton, an attorney with lead defense attorney Mark Geragos' law firm, drove to the house and asked reporters if someone had reported a burglary.
Dalton went to Stewart's Modesto law office Friday morning and dropped off some items requested by the Rocha family, Stewart said.
Monday, the defense team moved other items, including what appeared to be gifts, to the Modesto office of defense co-counsel Kirk McAllister, for transfer to Laci Peterson's family. But the items had not been picked up by Friday morning, McAllister said.
Stewart said in front of the home that it would be "ridiculous" to suggest that the Rochas broke into the home.
"I apologize for it coming down to this," he said. "This is not the way we operate. This is for Laci, for Conner and Laci's family. It is not for the media or Mr. Scott Peterson's defense in any way, shape or form. It's depressing that it's come down to this."
Stanislaus County Chief Deputy District Attorney John Goold said prosecutors had no legal authority over the house.
"It's not a crime scene," Goold said. " This is a civil problem between the Rochas and the Petersons."
The house title is in Laci and Scott Petersons' names, county records show. In such a joint tenancy, when one titleholder dies, the title goes to the other.
------------------------------------------------------------
Incident brings Peterson case close to home
Victim's family moves items from house, raising the issue of ownership.
By Garth Stapley and John Coté
The Modesto Bee
(Published Saturday, May 31, 2003, 4:47 AM)
MODESTO -- Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.
Police officers were dispatched after a security company notified them that the alarm at the Covena Avenue home had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.
Officers determined that members of the Rocha family and friends of Laci Peterson were removing items that belonged to the slain woman and documented what was taken, Savelli said.
"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the police department that this was not a burglary. It was a dispute over property and was best handled between the families and their attorneys."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access
Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access
By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER
Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:56 AM PDT
A Stanislaus County judge on Friday ordered that arrest and search warrants remain sealed in the case against Scott Peterson, who is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and unborn son.
Superior Court Judge Al Giro-lami's ruling also ordered the autopsy reports for Laci and Conner to stay sealed.
Thursday, District Attorney James Brazelton reversed his position and asked to have the autopsy reports made public, and the matter is set for hearing June 6.
Brazelton's about-face came after part of the fetus's autopsy report was leaked to the media. Prosecutors said that portion was clearly "skewed in favor of the defense."
Defense attorneys, coroner's officials, police and prosecutors have denied leaking the information.
Friday, in his ruling on all the documents, Girolami said releasing them "might irreparably harm the continued investigation into this criminal matter."
"Despite the fact that the complaint has been issued and a suspect has been arrested, the investigation and search for both incriminating and exonerating evidence in this matter continues," Girolami wrote.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys argued that releasing the documents could impede Peterson's right to a fair trial and damage an ongoing investigation.
Girolami agreed, saying in his ruling that releasing the documents "might result in the evidence being destroyed and witnesses being reluctant to step forward."
A group of newspapers, including The Bee, are seeking to have the documents unsealed.
Right to view reports argued
Charity Kenyon, an attorney representing the newspapers, argued that the public's right to view court documents was fundamental in an open legal system.
Other means exist for ensuring
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed
Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed
The Modesto Bee
The Associated Press
Published: May 31, 2003, 06:49:17 AM PDT
MODESTO, Calif. (AP) - A judge ruled Friday that an autopsy report on the deaths of Laci Peterson and her unborn son should remain sealed along with other search warrant and arrest records.
Superior Court Judge Al Girolami said releasing the information could hamper the murder investigation and prejudice public opinion before a trial begins.
Girolami is scheduled to hear more arguments June 6 from prosecutors preparing a murder case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson. Prosecutors on Thursday asked that the autopsy reports be released to the public. They argued that media leaks of the reports are biased toward the defense.
Girolami also ordered that leaks of sealed information stop and indicated he would consider a gag order to stop the prosecution and defense teams from talking to the media.
Scott Peterson, 30, is accused of killing his wife and unborn son, whom the couple had planned to name Conner, last December in their home. Laci, 27, was eight months pregnant at the time. The bodies washed ashore in San Francisco Bay last month.
Contra Costa County authorities concluded their autopsy report earlier this month, but did not disclose the cause of death.
Several media outlets have released details of the coroner's report, and a spokeswoman for Laci Peterson's family members said Thursday they were "devastated" at hearing autopsy reports without warning on television.
The leaked reports indicated the unborn son had plastic tape wrapped around his neck and a significant cut across the shoulders.
Meanwhile, friends of Laci Peterson removed several personal articles Friday from the single-story Modesto home where she and Scott Peterson lived.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MOM'S MOVING MOMENT
By HOWARD BREUER and MARSHA KRANES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 31, 2003 -- Laci Peterson's mother - shattered by the graphic details leaked from the 25-page autopsy of her unborn grandson - yesterday began removing her slain daughter's belongings from the home she had shared with her accused murderer husband, Scott.
Sharon Rocha, accompanied by several friends and relatives, was seen at the Modesto, Calif., house removing the rocking chair Laci had bought to use when she nursed her infant son, as well as unopened Christmas gifts, clothing, chairs, lamps and artwork.
In doing so, she ignored the advice of her lawyer, Al Clark, that she wait until he, Scott Peterson's lawyers and court officials work out the procedures to be followed when she entered the house.
Modesto police arrived while Rocha was there, and she and her entourage left a short time later after packing seven cars full of Laci's belongings.
Hours later, lawyers representing Laci's family and Scott Peterson started haggling over whether removing the items was legal.
Scott Peterson's mother, Jackie, expressed outrage that the items had been removed since Laci's family had "absolutely no permission to be in that house."
Scott Peterson has pleaded not guilty to killing his wife and their unborn son.
Laci's family said Wednesday that they had hired lawyers to help them retrieve a baby crib and jewelry from the home.
Meanwhile, Clark told Fox News his client's anger over the grisly revelations leaked from her daughter's and grandson's sealed autopsy reports drove her to go get her daughter's possessions.
A family spokeswoman said Rocha was "devastated" by the reports describing how the near full-term fetus of her grandson Conner had plastic tape wrapped around the neck and a large cut across the chest when he was found in the shallow waters of San Francisco Bay last month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...
As a victim's parent, I think the Rochas felt compelled to do what they did. After all, during these events, since Dec 23rd, Scott, wasn't very cooperate with the Rochas either then. Especially after Jan 24th press conference.
It will be all ironed out in the end in the probate court, and most likely a civil court... besides the criminal actions on scaughty.. ;o)
Whoa! There's a swimming pool at Scaughty's house? I didn't know that, but I probably should have, it being California and all. Has there been any speculation that he could have drown her? After all, if he drowned her, and then dumped her body in the ocean, would there be proof as to whether she drowned in a pool or in the ocean? I'm wondering if chlorine would still be present in the lungs after all this time in saltwater. He could have knocked her out or drugged her, then dragged her to the pool to drown her. There's a wooden fence around the place isn't there? What better way of committing a crime out there after dark and no one being able to see you do it?
All of the jewelry, Laci's wedding band, diamond ring, and her grandmother's jewelry given to Laci had all been sent to a jeweler by Scott to be "reset into one ring". That or he was going to sell it or give it to Amber?
But then, looking for final sweet justice if the Rocha's file a civil suit for the deaths of Laci and Conner. ;o)
I have the same problem you do. All indicators point to the husband. I recall seeing him on some show where he "broke down and cried". It was absurd. Very contrived. Almost comical in that it was such bad acting.
Nobody really knows what evidence the police have. Hopefully they will have something that gives them a slam dunk here. But, keep in mind that EVERY DAY people get away with murder. The OJ case was a "slam dunk" for example. I personally heard that from one of the lead detectives in that case. And he was right. But he was wrong.
As far as the family taking things out of the house? They had no more right to what they did than I do. They should have kept the high ground. They basically did break in and steal things. Doing so reflects badly on their daughters and grandsons memories. And takes the focus off Scott and gives his defense slime something to make noise about. Dumb move on their part.
sorry, just had to say this... heehee...
You are 100 percent right on all the posts here. It is amazing that people are so misinformed about property rights. The house and all its contents belonged to the husband and wife. If the wife dies, it belongs to the husband 100 percent, including the right to determine who goes in there. IF the property of another person is in the house, for example a lawnmower borrowed by Scott, that person is not allowed to enter and take it. The proper action is to ask a court to get it back for you. It seems that none of the property taken by the Rochas belonged to them. If it belonged to Laci at the time of her death, it belonged to Scott when she died. The Rocha's only right was to ask Scott to give it to them to be a nice guy, which it looks like he was willing to do.
It was a burglary, pure and simple, one which the police allowed to occur while they watched. The Rochas had no colorable right to possess the items they took.
Convict him, sue him in court, get a judgment, then take the house and everything in it. Do it the right way, or else it may be your ex-mother in law with a friend in the police force showing up at your door while you are on vacation and saying it's a civil matter while she steals your stuff.
I don't see that happening, if only because any 'evidence' has most likely been removed by police investigators - I agree, though, that Geregos is scum - But Sharon Rocha could have handled this differently, imho...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.