Replies

"Scott's mother revealed that the dress was taken in a mid-January burglary at the house..."

That's interesting. One of the women who went to the Peterson house yesterday said that Sharon was able to get the bridal gown.

The Petersons are being a-holes about this. I heard Jackie Peterson the night before on Fox News tell Greta that there was no problem with Sharon going into the house and taking what was Laci's. Then yesterday, we see one of Peterson's lawyers ranting for the cameras about the Rocha's planting evidence at the scene. Of course nothing was said about the Peterson's having been in and out of that house since the beginning of all this, and that they could have REMOVED evidence. What a nightmare for the Rochas. I feel so bad for them, and then they have to put up with the pathetic antics of the Petersons and their lawyers.

I'm afraid Mrs. Peterson is still delusional. She actually believes that her son is going to be back in that house during her lifetime? And on top of this, her murdering son wants the diamonds that Laci's grandmother gave her. I'm sure they were taken to a jeweler for resetting. More like he took them somewhere to hock them. If those diamonds can be recovered, they should either be returned to the grandmother if she is still alive, or they should be turned over to Sharon or her ex-husband, based on whichever grandmother gave them to her. But they should most definitely not be given back to Scaughty or his family

This story gets uglier all the time, and I guess we can thank Mark Geragos for this. He may think he's helping his client, but all he's doing is alienating the public. After all that's happened, it's pretty obvious that the Peterson's have been less than honest in their statements about letting Sharon Rocha into the home. But that doesn't surprise me. They raised a lying, sack of murdering $hit for a son, why wouldn't they be liars themselves?

I don't know about the rest of you, but the treatment of the Rochas at the hands of the Peterson's has disgusted me. Jackie Peterson's lucky I'm not Laci's mother. Right now she'd be turning blue, because I would have wrapped her oxygen hose around her neck and pulled it tight!!

RE Laci's wedding gown. Jackie said it was stolen (the woman walking the dog?), but "Scot got it back". Then it was sent to the cleaners and boxed, so presumably that is how Laci's mother was able to get it back.

When Jackie called in to Greta's show earlier, however, she told Greta that there was not "one thing of Laci's" in the house. Yet the Rochas found truckloads of Laci's things there. From my BS meter, I read Jackie's statement to mean that everything was Scott's, not Laci's.

RE Laci's wedding gown. Jackie said it was stolen (the woman walking the dog?), but "Scot got it back". Then it was sent to the cleaners and boxed, so presumably that is how Laci's mother was able to get it back.

When Jackie called in to Greta's show earlier, however, she told Greta that there was not "one thing of Laci's" in the house. Yet the Rochas found truckloads of Laci's things there. From my BS meter, I read Jackie's statement to mean that everything was Scott's, not Laci's.

Jackie Peterson's lucky I'm not Laci's mother. Right now she'd be turning blue, because I would have wrapped her oxygen hose around her neck and pulled it tight!!

ROFLMAO that's a good one!!!!

If one presumes Scott guilty of murdering Laci and Connor, then any attempt by Scott or his family to claim or keep items connected to Laci or Connor seems an outrage.

However, if one presumes Scott innocent, as we know his mother does, then it is perfectly reasonable that she would be horrified that the family was acting like Scott had no claim to the baby's things or gifts received on their marriage, or any other item they bought as a couple, or even Laci's own things.

I can understand and sympathise with the unrestrained anger of the Rocha's, but also the mother's goggles that Jackie Peterson has on.

Really, technically, at this point most of the items mentioned belong to Scott. It would be better if the Rochas and Petersons cataloged all the items, agreed not to disburse them or liquidate them, and then settled the matter once the trial or trials are over.

If Scott were to be convicted of murder, then naturally the proper disposition of the items would be to Laci's relatives. If not, there would probably be a civil trial that would determine if Scott had rights to the contents of Laci's estate.