Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carolinamom
LOL! I'm sure it varies, but THIS "voice of experience" got swollen fingers!

But, okay, let's think about if she HADN'T had that swelling. So we're back to: why was her wedding ring OFF her finger to begin with??? People don't just take their wedding ring off all the time--except cheaters, and she wasn't into THAT, from all that we've heard.

And also: suppose she HAD taken her ring off momentarily, to put lotion on her hands or something. Well, how did Scott know where she'd put it???
37 posted on 05/31/2003 8:00:21 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
I'd like to know WHEN these rings/diamonds were taken to the jeweler......and WHO took them.....and WHY they wanted them made into a single ring.....and WHO was going to be wearing that ring. Little things like that, you know.

AND an important point made last night by the Rocha's attorney: Until the death certificate is signed and filed, Laci is STILL legally the half owner of the house and its contents, a point seemingly ignored by Geragos and the Petersons.

39 posted on 05/31/2003 8:13:23 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Devil_Anse
swollen fingers or no swollen fingers...can someone post the picture of Laci in her red pantsuit (that looked as though was taken at Christmas time)? Maybe that will show us if she had them on or not?
60 posted on 05/31/2003 8:50:33 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson