Skip to comments.
High-definition TV exposes Hollywood's ugly truths
Canada.com ^
| 5/30/03
| Aaron Sands
Posted on 05/30/2003 11:19:23 PM PDT by OneVike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
To: ladyinred
Okay question for you. I was under the understanding that a lot of the props a few years back (i.e. news desks, sitcom chairs and tables) were having to be replaced for this exact problem that would arise. Have you seen any of that on the HD channels you do get
61
posted on
05/31/2003 10:15:51 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: OneVike
"When seen on film," Mr. Swann says, "Diaz's skin imperfections are not noticeable, thanks to Hollywood's talented makeup artists. However, with HDTV, the picture is so precise that the acne damage cannot be hidden. In a high-def broadcast of Charlie's Angels on HBO, Diaz looks like a different person. She's still very pretty. But to be frank, I doubt that she would make People's most beautiful list." This makes no sense. The source for the HD videotape is the film. The videotape can't create definition that isn't in the film.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson