[AuH2ORepublican]

"I think Shundler might actually have a shot at it this time around."

---

I agree, Schundler will have a much better chance in 2005. He has been proven correct about everything he said about McGreevey during the 2001 campaign.

[OceanKing]

I find it funny how snowballed most are. Doug isn't a conservative. He played one in politics. Doug now, is raising money through a PAC he created to help social moderate women win races.

I would love to see a debate between mcsleazy and the "new and improved Doug". "Well Mr. McGreevey, I agree with you". "And MR. Forrester, I agree with you".

Frankly, if we are going to elect a liberal, let's go all the way and re-elect McGreevey. He will piss more people off and then a real Republican (conservative) can take office. Either that or vote for Schundler!

Forrester was the liberal conservative. If your group was liberal, so was he. If your group was conservative, so was he. He played both sides against the middle, and it bit him in the backside.

With Schundler, you know where you stand. Although I don't like some of those working for him, to effect the most change in Trenton, he is the best bet.