To: Pokey78; Miss Marple; piasa; McGavin999; blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ladyinred; Amelia; justshe; ...
FYI.
3 posted on
05/30/2003 9:10:28 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Shocking. You mean that the US had more than one reason for its foreign policy to be focused on taking Saddam out? I thought Bush could only handle one idea at a time.
4 posted on
05/30/2003 9:14:59 PM PDT by
Torie
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping, Howlin. VERY good article.
6 posted on
05/30/2003 9:19:48 PM PDT by
Amelia
To: Howlin
We had a deal with the Saudi's, we were going to remove Saddam come hell or high water. They couldn't deal with their radical problem until our troops were gone. We could not go until Saddam was out. Has anyone noticed the crackdown going on in Saudia Arabia? All part of what I call The Crawford Plan. Remember when the Saudi prince went to Crawford?
7 posted on
05/30/2003 9:20:26 PM PDT by
blam
To: Howlin; blam; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; Brad's Gramma; FairOpinion; Cvengr
12 posted on
05/30/2003 9:48:08 PM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
To: Howlin
Wonder how much it cost us yearly to maintain the No Fly Zone? An expensive operation we no longer foot the bill for.
28 posted on
05/31/2003 4:50:11 AM PDT by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson