Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Perhaps my ignorance and mental limitations blind me to the obvious but the answer to this problem seems to be in the semantics. For a particle to have a position it must be fixed in space, not moving. If it is fixed it has no momentum. Therefore, momentum and position are mutually exclusive.

No, extended bodies have position whether or not their momentum is nonzero. A car, travelling down the highway, has a position - it's somewhere at all times, right?

20 posted on 05/30/2003 11:28:05 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Chemist_Geek
....it's somewhere at all times, right?

Yes, but when you introduce momentum, or movement, you can't have just one place. You need a sequence of places and therefore no ONE place. As a result, it seems to me, the concept of momentum and position simultaneously is mutually exclusive.

24 posted on 05/30/2003 11:52:21 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson