Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Just look at Post 272. The poster suggested that now that the Rochas had gone into the house--against the will of Scott's attorneys--that the defense would proceed to claim that the scene had been "compromised" and that now the defense would be deprived of doing "their own investigation".

I told that poster I thought she was right on. I think Geragos has some motion or other in there in which he demands that the house be left as is, so the defense can do their own investigation. I think he will claim that this is now impossible due to the Rochas' actions, and will later use that as a ground for appeal, if an appeal is necessary.
813 posted on 05/31/2003 12:49:34 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Just look at Post 272. The poster suggested that now that the Rochas had gone into the house--against the will of Scott's attorneys--that the defense would proceed to claim that the scene had been "compromised" and that now the defense would be deprived of doing "their own investigation".

That was me. I'd be surprised if Mark doesn't take that tack ... but, as I said, he will ask for a dismissal but will surely be DENIED. But this is his opportunity to act indignant and wronged. He'll exploit it.

835 posted on 05/31/2003 6:46:11 AM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson