To: Clint N. Suhks
Like I said, it behooves you to deflect the comparison because any honest look at the comparison damns the authors spurious misrepresentation that this "leather fetish" convention is representative of homosexuality in general.
86 posted on
06/02/2003 6:14:09 AM PDT by
tdadams
To: tdadams
Like I said, it behooves you to deflect the comparison because any honest look at the comparison damns the authors spurious misrepresentation that this "leather fetish" convention is representative of homosexuality in general. Its called DATA and the interpretation of said DATA is supported by the DATA. That means for that EXAMPLE the convention was a burden on society, which doesnt make his conclusions wrong.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson