Replies

I've told you I'm not playing your game and I've told you why. Why should I give an honest answer to a dishonest question? Why on earth do you still expect me to 'give you a number'. I'm not. How many days, weeks, or months do you intend to stalk me?

I could accuse you of the very same things - obfuscation and misdirection -that you're accusing me of since you still haven't answered my question. And it's obvious why. If you answer my question honestly you couldn't pretend that you wouldn't also outright reject a polemic you know to be biased. Answering my question would expose how disingenuous your challenge to me is.

Instead you want to keep up this charade, insisting that I'm dodging you when I've already responded to you and moved on, something you seem incapable of doing. You must think Freepers are idiots who can't see below the surface.

Obviously you don't like it when your obfuscation is made evident to all. You can call it whatever you want, but when you use the same techniques on different threads I'm going to point out your history of similar behavior. To make it go away you can admit your opinion of the summary is based on ignorance of what the book actually says and you have no interest in knowing that the book actually says.

You can answer your own question... How many days, weeks or months are you going to continue your obfuscation?

How about telling us how providing you with the context of each summary is somehow dishonest?

I've given you plenty of opportunities to provide evidence to support your claim the summary is biased but you won't even try. Hey, I've even tried to support your claim but the information just doesn't exist. There is simply nothing I can find to support your position. And you, you don't even try and then you call my attempts to get you to answer an honest question, dishonest. Sheesh.

I appears you realize this and will do and say anything to avoid admitting your assessment of the summary was wrong. Completely wrong. And that's what is so bothersome. You don't seem want to admit a gay agenda exists despite the overwhelming evidence to the contray.

Would you agree the summary of point #1 is an accurate summary of the book? I've provided the context for you here.

In that post I asked you if I should continue posting the context of the additional summaries and you said Please do but you never provided me with a number. I've asked, using your own words, which of the summaries are highly perjorative but you refuse to provide a number.