[Clint N. Suhks]

...you somehow percieved me as saying "My study trumps your study", well, I can only suggest you take a remedial reading comprehension class.

Your reply to me.

"...I pointed out that several other studies have consistently shown a higher correlation of sexual orientation among identical twins than among fraternal twins, thus shattering your risible argument.

Digging a hole to China?

[tdadams]

Oh, I'm laughing out loud now. That response to you was to counter your assertion that the study you were touting somehow should be considered more plausible than others - the very thing you falsely accused me of doing.

I've come to understand you have a reactive need to protest when you're shown to be wrong, but come on. Are you trying to convince me that you're completely incapable of an honest assertion?