Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams
You're entire retort consist of the baseless assertion that I have no credibility.

Why tdadams has NO credibility.

1. He cites studies he can’t defend.

2. He cites studies he won’t cite.

3. He make false allegations that hard data is impossible conclusion if it doesn’t follow “probabilities.”

4. He makes false allegations of me “cherry picking” studies.

5. He makes false allegations of prominent twin studies being funded for ulterior motives.

6. He continually cites the data from one study as the only reasonable conclusion for his debate.

7. He has NO ability to understand scientific reseach as he claimed.

8. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

9. He’s a hypocrite

10. We could make this 20 if we wanted to.

116 posted on 06/02/2003 8:14:00 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks
You're 0 for 10. If you want to make if 0 for 20, go ahead. I'll have another good laugh.
117 posted on 06/02/2003 8:20:56 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson