[Michael.SF.]

demanding that we "immediately cease and desist from photographing and displaying and identifying photographs of Ms. Streisand's home on the website.

OK, I have read all comments above and am going to have to say that BS has a valid point. Consider the following:

1. What purpose is served by specifically identifying her home on the website? All the purported reasons for the research can be accomplished w/o specifically identifying the property as hers. I wonder how many other homes are identified by owner?

2. There are lots of kooks out there (BS is one of them). Someone could gain information from the website, which could then be used to assist that person in causing her harm.

3. Her lawyers did ask them to cease and desist. They could easily have stopped identifying her house w/o losing any free speech rights.

50 million? Yes, ridiculous. The fact that it is an environmental activist website, yes she is a hypocrite.

But there is some validity in her complaint.

[xp38]

I agree but it's fun to see liberals attacking each other. If you can read the filed complaint with an adobe reader there's loads of unintentional laughs. She's upset the location of the parasols around her pool are revealed among other things.

[friendly]

Babs is very, very paranoid, probably psychotic. He contracts include legal stipulations that "little people" not be allowed to directly look at her. Hillary barks out identical demands.

[friendly]

Babs is very, very paranoid, probably psychotic. Her contracts include legal stipulations that "little people" not be allowed to directly look at her. Hillary barks out identical demands.

[friendly]

Babs is very, very paranoid, probably psychotic. Her contracts include legal stipulations that "little people" not be allowed to directly look at her. Hillary barks out identical demands.