Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passengers pummel slashing skyjacker
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 29, 2003 | N/A

Posted on 05/29/2003 4:30:59 PM PDT by scripter

P>A report in the Melbourne Herald Sun says the man, onboard a flight from Melbourne to Launceston, Australia, was armed with two wooden stakes, an aerosol can and a yellow cigarette lighter.

The would-be hijacker reportedly raced down the aisle of the plane "with his hands raised in the air" armed with the stakes, according to one witness.

"There were people screaming and crying, and there was a real commotion going on," Derek Finlay, a Canadian paramedic who helped tackle the attacker, told the Australian paper. "There were large amounts of blood coming out of [chief flight attendant] Greg's head. As soon as we realized what was going on, six or seven of us jumped on [the hijacker]."

Flight attendant Greg Khan won praise from passengers.

"The fellow Greg, really was a hero. ... If it wasn't for him we could've been in a lot of trouble," passenger Keith Charlton told the Herald Sun. "As he was being attacked, he put his head down into the man's chest and he pushed him back down the plane. He had two severe injuries to his head – one was on the chin, one was on the top of his head."

According to the report, a female flight attendant was slashed across the face as the attacker made his way toward the cockpit.

From the moment of the attack till the man was subdued, the drama lasted just 20 seconds.

The flight attendants were in serious but stable condition in a Melbourne hospital. Two passengers were treated for minor injuries, reports the paper.

After the man was subdued, passengers restrained him with plastic ties while the plane returned to Melbourne.

"We believe he was trying to take over the plane," the paper quotes police officer Stephen Cato as saying.

"Very shortly after take-off ... the man started to become very threatening," Transport Minister John Anderson told the media. "He apparently headed for the cabin and seemed to be intent upon trying to force a nasty outcome. If you call it an attempt to crash an aircraft, you might call that a hijacking."

Anderson said Australian security measures would not have flagged the man as a danger, since carrying pieces of wood onto an airplane is not a violation of the rules.

Qantas Chief Executive Officer Geoff Dixon said in a statement there was nothing to suggest the incident was related to terrorist activity.

"We do not believe at this stage this is terrorist-related in any way," he told reporters.

The suspect was being questioned by authorities in Melbourne. According to one source, he talked of " God's will or Armageddon" during the interrogation.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australia; hijack; qantas
Searched and didn't see this posted.
1 posted on 05/29/2003 4:30:59 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scripter
This guy must have forgotten his tin-foil. This is an obvious result of cosmic radiation.
2 posted on 05/29/2003 4:36:36 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
The passengers should have emasculated this this creep.
3 posted on 05/29/2003 4:49:57 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Good lord. What are we allowing fellow passengers to do by attacking him and infringing on his rights???

He wasn't doing anything wrong, according to authorities. He was merely sporting some wood and that's not illegal. [extended sarcasm]

4 posted on 05/29/2003 4:51:31 PM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
"with his hands raised in the air" armed with the stakes, according to one witness.

Bubby the Vampire Slayer.

FMCDH

5 posted on 05/29/2003 4:52:45 PM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Perhaps in the future, passengers will board container crates and a plane will simply pick up the container and deliver it - no interaction allowed between the container and the craft.

I remember watching a sci-fi movie about the 21st century, think it was called Doppelganger. They had an airport with planes like that. The skeletal part of the plane lifts up, rolls over the passenger container, locks onto it and takes off.

6 posted on 05/29/2003 4:55:34 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
That's the most sensible suggestion yet. Leave it to a Freeper.
7 posted on 05/29/2003 5:11:57 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The passengers should have emasculated this this creep.

How do we know they didn't? By crushing rather than cutting of course. :)

8 posted on 05/29/2003 6:17:08 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I have a question (probably racist, don't anyone sue me, I'm just curious) was this person of middle eastern descent or Muslim or both? Does anyone know?
9 posted on 05/29/2003 8:01:25 PM PDT by The Californian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Californian
That's certainly a thought that went through my head. At this point we don't know. The article states they don't think it was terrorist related but who knows what that could mean.

The ACLU wants to talk with you, though. :-/

10 posted on 05/29/2003 8:44:56 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I've been saying since 9/11, that there should be a hardened bulkhead between the cockpit and the passenger cabin.

There would be no communication from the cabin to the flight crew, save for a"panic button".The cabin crew could push it in an emergency. It would tell the flight crew to land at the closest airport, where it would be met by armed law,as well as medical help. The captain could still communicate via a one way PA system.

The bulkhead would be located directly aft of the front door,the passengers would enter and exit theough the rear door.

11 posted on 05/29/2003 8:56:28 PM PDT by snowtigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scripter
YIKES!
12 posted on 05/29/2003 9:13:54 PM PDT by The Californian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson