To: Howlin
It's my understanding (bearing in mind I'm not an attorney) that if he knows someone else did it, he is obligated as an officer of the court to turn this information over to the law. Any actual attorneys care to comment?
I think he knows who did it, and the reason that he can't turn the perp over to the law is because the perp is his own client. (Personal opinion only, folks--I know others may think otherwise.)
8 posted on
05/29/2003 3:17:46 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: MizSterious
You may be correct, that justice issue may supercede Abrahams right to protect his 'sources' (ie Garagos private detectives)
Could be major miscalculation by the defense.
13 posted on
05/29/2003 3:21:31 PM PDT by
ewing
To: MizSterious
I think you're exactly right; this is ALL Geragos spin, including the rumors about Amber Frey doing a Playboy layout.
17 posted on
05/29/2003 3:24:05 PM PDT by
Howlin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson