[SarahW]

You are acting like she has been offered and accepted money for nude pics. There isn't even a rumor to that effect, except for the one started here.

She did have pics taken of her before, in 1999, that showed her scantily clad, nude or semi-nude. They were taken in a proffessional studio.

That studio, which still has the pics and proofs, may want to sell them badly. But that's not the same as Amber selling them.

They seem to be trying to make a case that she "abandoned" the pics, by not coming back for the photos or the proofs (so they aren't "hers" anymore)...
however, she probaby did not sign a release for the studio to sell them.

They might well be trying to get her to release them or to make a case that they have a right to sell them as long as she is compensated.

The studio

[melodie]

ALERT

MSNBC Dan Abrams is on has some of the autopsy report. the baby had 1.5 loops of tape around his NECK!!

[Devil_Anse]

If she hadn't posed for those photos, she wouldn't even have to worry about someone else publishing them for profit, against her will.

Which just proves the point that posing for nudie photos is a bad idea. She did something that was a bad idea. Too bad it can't be over with no further negative consequences to her, but it appears it is now coming back to haunt her.

[Sandylapper]

You are acting like she has been offered and accepted money for nude pics. There isn't even a rumor to that effect, except for the one started here.

Sarah, I saw on probably Fox News (which I watch most of the time), Gloria Allred, approximately a week or so ago, trying to glaze over that Amber had ever received any money for any of her pics. Gloria tried to make a half-a$$ denial, but she never said definitively, "Amber has never, ever sold one or some of those pics to anyone". It was discussed on some thread here. Might have been on the really long 1,000+ thread. The rumor was NOT started here, IIRC. If I'm wrong, I'll be the first to apologize.