Posted on 05/29/2003 5:34:23 AM PDT by runningbear
Laci Peterson family seeks items from home
Laci Peterson family seeks items from home
Relatives hire lawyers to retrieve wedding dress, baby crib, other personal belongings.
By John Coté
The Modesto Bee
(Published Thursday, May 29, 2003, 4:15 AM)
MODESTO -- Laci Peterson's family has hired attorneys in an attempt to retrieve her wedding dress, a baby crib and other personal items from her Modesto home, according to a statement released Wednesday.
In the murder case against her husband, court documents made available Wednesday assert the defense team's contention that investigators violated the law by monitoring privileged communications and that Deputy District Attorney Rick Distaso "misled" defense attorneys and the judge about it. Scott Peterson, 30, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder in the deaths of his 27-year-old wife and their unborn son, Conner.
Scott Peterson's parents and his attorney have prevented his wife's family from entering the couple's Covena Avenue home and retrieving personal items, according to the statement from attorneys Adam J. Stewart and Albert G. Clark.
The statement came with a 22-point list of items that family members want, including Laci's diplomas and journals, and a watering can that says "Laci's Garden." But family members said that being inside the home that Laci decorated and lived in was more important than retrieving personal items.
According to the statement, lead defense attorney Mark Geragos wrote a letter in response to the request for access. The Laci Peterson family attorneys, in their statement, say that Geragos said it would be "unthinkable to allow anything to be moved or disposed of" until his team had completed its investigation.
Meanwhile, the newly available court documents show that defense attorneys have requested a closed hearing to question prosecutors about wiretaps used to intercept calls between Scott Peterson and his defense team.
The defense drafted the documents before Superior Court Judge Al Girolami on Tuesday ordered prosecutors to turn over "all calls intercepted involving defense counsel or the defense investigator." Also, the defense has asked for a transcript of a Jan. 17 wiretap discussion among Judge Wray Ladine, prosecutors and investigators, the documents reveal.
Defense attorneys have a Friday deadline to file a motion on the wiretap issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laci Peterson's Family Hires Lawyers to Collect Mementos
Laci Peterson's Family Hires Lawyers to Collect Mementos
MODESTO A Modesto law firm says it has been hired to help Laci Peterson's family visit their daughter's house and collect her wedding dress, jewelry and other mementos.
Lawyers Adam Stewart and Albert Clark say they were hired after Scott Peterson's family prevented his in-laws from entering the house the couple shared before Laci Peterson vanished just before Christmas.
Scott Peterson has pleaded innocent to murdering his wife and unborn son. The remains of the 27-year-old pregnant substitute teacher and the infant they planned to name Conner were found on the shore of San Francisco Bay last month.
Defense lawyer Mark Geragos says he has worked out an agreement to let Laci Peterson's family visit the house and remove her journals, a food processor and a watering can that said "Laci's Garden."
Copyright © 2003 KABC-TV and the Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Last Updated: May 28, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE LAWYER TO GET PETERSON PHONE LOGS
DEFENSE LAWYER TO GET PETERSON PHONE LOGS
(05-27-2003) - The judge overseeing the murder case of Scott Peterson ordered Tuesday that police records of telephone calls made between Peterson and his lawyer and investigator be turned over to his new defense attorney.
Prosecutors had not contested the release of the conversations, which they said they had not heard or seen and had ordered sealed when they realized police investigators had been listening to or recording calls.
At least two of the 69 calls between Peterson and Modesto attorney Kirk McAllister were included in the widespread monitoring that also taped Peterson's calls with reporters. Police also listened in on a call between Peterson and a private investigator.
Peterson's new attorney, Mark Geragos, said he expected to receive the police records Tuesday afternoon.
"Once we see exactly what was taped, we'll file the appropriate motions," the Los Angeles attorney said.
Peterson, 30, is accused of killing his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, and unborn son, Conner, last Dec. 23 or 24. Stanislaus County prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty.
Peterson, arrested April 18, maintains his innocence, saying he last saw his wife when he left for a Christmas Eve fishing trip.
Stanislaus County prosecutors this month notified McAllister, private investigator Gary Ermoian and 64 other people that their conversations were intercepted from Jan. 10 to Feb. 4 under a court-ordered wiretap to gather evidence in the Peterson investigation.
Police are not supposed to listen to talks between attorneys and their clients, which are considered privileged conversations. McAllister said earlier this year he was skeptical of claims that police recording equipment was turned off when it became clear that Peterson was talking with his lawyer.
But John Goold, a chief deputy district attorney for Stanislaus County, told reporters Tuesday that prosecutors have never seen or heard anything from the Peterson-McAllister calls monitored by police.
"Our requirement is to not listen in on privileged phone calls," Goold said.
Also Tuesday, Judge Al Girolami said he was also considering a gag order on lawyers in the case to prevent leaks fueling news stories, and indicated he would wait until July to decide whether to unseal court records reporters are seeking.
Girolami said he would rule by the end of the week whether to unseal police reports and arrest warrants, as well as autopsy results of Laci Peterson and her unborn son.
But the Modesto judge told Charity Kenyon, a Sacramento lawyer representing The Modesto Bee and four other California newspapers, that he would most likely order that the documents remain impounded until a July 15 preliminary hearing, held to determine whether Peterson should go to trial.
Girolami wondered aloud, given the great amount of publicity in the case, whether 12 fair jurors could be found anywhere in California if the information was unsealed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another Peterson trial
Nurse becomes seventh member of Peterson jury
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...
"When all is said and done, that house will BELONG to the Rochas because a murderer OR his family cannot profit from a murder; and then the Rochas can SUE the Petersons for anything that is missing.ROTFLMAO!!! Such intolerance and venom. I can't belive you're attacking the Petersons before all the facts are in. What's the matter, lost your objectivity???I cannot believe anyone is defending these tacky people. In the name of all that is HOLY, they should let those people in to MOURN their daughter, you and your "legalese" excuses be damned."
Gee, why even have a trial Howlin. According to you he doesn't need or deserve one. Why don't you just lynch the guy???? You all have tried and convicted him here---without examining the first piece of evidence or hearing the first word of testimony. So much for the Constitution.
As to suing the Peterson's, the Rocha's would be better off trying sue the MPD, they failed to secure the property. It has been broken into you know. It would appear, more than once.
The facts are IN, pal. The Petersons have the only key to the house and they're not allowing the Rochas in.
Oh my, to borrow a phrase...in the name of all that is HOLY, how can you say that?
I heard Mrs. Peterson state, that she has never been asked by the Rochas to enter the home and further that she had no problem with it.
Gee, do you have some facts to refute her?? If you do, show 'em. Because I certainly have seen none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.