To: Chancellor Palpatine
Foley said, is that it's nobody's business but his own YES! I agree.
As for McCollum, he's WAY WAY WAY WAY too soft on the 2nd Amendment(Foley isn't perfect, but MUCH better on that issue). Not to mention he LOST already. He also pushed for a Patriot Act(secret searches) type bill for Butcher Reno. The only good thing McCollum has over Foley is that he's pro-life.
I'd back Foley over McCollum. I don't like his abortion stance at all, but McCollum lost once already, and is much more hostile to freedom
48 posted on
05/28/2003 1:31:50 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
To: Dan from Michigan
That said, I'd back Weldon first if he ran.
52 posted on
05/28/2003 1:33:35 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
To: Dan from Michigan; Chancellor Palpatine
I'd like a third choice. The negatives as pointed out by many on this thread make me think neither is electable, unless they are running against a far left whacko like Deutch.
53 posted on
05/28/2003 1:34:05 PM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(Tax cuts signed into law today,Tom Dasshole is deeply saddened)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson