Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Times also has a columnist problem (Maureen Dowd Under Review)
New York Daily News ^ | 5/28/03 | Zev Chafets

Posted on 05/28/2003 1:18:57 AM PDT by kattracks

In the town where I live, you can turn in a criminal by calling (800) 898-TIPS. The New York Times now offers a similar service to its readers. They can finger crooked stories by sending an E-mail to The Times at retrace@nytimes.com.

Jayson Blair is the proximate cause of this humiliating hotline. But some of the TIPS coming into The Times aren't about Blair.

Nobody knows exactly who's under investigation. Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Rick Bragg was suspended last week for letting an uncredited intern do his reporting. He's quitting.

And at least one other internal review is taking place. It concerns Pulitzer Prize columnist Maureen Dowd.

I'm not a certified Timesologist, but I can't say I'm shocked by what's happening at the Newspaper of Record. I've been expecting a blowup since August, when The Times ran a front-page story misrepresenting Henry Kissinger's views on war with Iraq. A newspaper willing to lie so boldly in pursuit of its editorial agenda is a newspaper out of control.

In fact, after the Kissinger incident, I stopped reading The Times' news section. But because I'm in the column-writing business, I continued looking at the editorial and op-ed pages. It was there, this month, that I came across an article by Dowd titled "Osama's Offspring."

Dowd famously dislikes President Bush. She often calls him names and says mean things about him. This time, she accused him of flimflamming the country. Two bombs had just gone off in Saudi Arabia and Morocco, presumably detonated by Al Qaeda. According to Dowd, this gave the lie to the President's assertion, delivered in a speech in Little Rock, Ark., that Al Qaeda was "spent."

Here's what she wrote:

"'Al Qaeda is on the run,' President Bush said last week. 'That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated ... they're not a problem anymore.'"

Here's what Bush actually said:

"Al Qaeda is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top Al Qaeda operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem anymore."

The words in italics were replaced in Dowd's column by three little dots. Those dots say to the reader: Trust me, I'm abbreviating here, but what I'm leaving out doesn't change the meaning.

But the dots did change the meaning. In fact, they turned it upside down.

Far from declaring Al Qaeda "spent," Bush was warning the country against complacency. The only terrorists the President declared "no longer a problem" were the ones already jailed or dead.

New York Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis says the paper is "looking into" the column.

If Dowd intentionally misrepresented the President's words, she is guilty of a journalistic offense much worse than Bragg's intern problem, or even Blair's fantasies.

Blair is a kid, after all, who made things up for fun and profit. Dowd is a major figure at The Times, a role model. A syndicated role model.

Other journalists, including Andrew Sullivan and Greg Pierce of The Washington Times, have noted Dowd's dot trick.

But as far as I know, I'm the first to turn her in to the TIPS hotline.

If The Times finds her guilty, it can send my reward money to the Home for Wayward Columnists.

And it should send Dowd there, too.

Originally published on May 28, 2003



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: falsification; grayladydown; howellraines; jaysonblair; maureendown; mediafraud; medialies; modo; modowd; moweddown; newyorktimes; nyt; plagiarism; thenewyorktimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2003 1:18:57 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Pokey78; Miss Marple

Catherine Zeta-Jones
2003 Academy Award Winner
Best Supporting Actress


From Oxblog:

IMMUTABLE LAWS OF DOWD

1. Ashcroft never deserves credit.

2. Offering constructive solutions to problems, instead of whining endlessly about them, is a sign of weakness.

3. The People Magazine principle: all political phenomena can be explained with reference solely to caricatures of the personalities involved ("Dubya" is stupid; "Poppy" is an aristocrat; Cheney is macho-man; etc.). Any reference to the common good or even to old-fashioned politicking is, like, so passe.

4. It is much better to be cute than coherent.

5. Maureen knows best. Her long years as a columnist (doing basically what your great-aunt Tillie does in the nursing home bull sessions, but getting paid for it) have given her deep insight into foreign relations, politics, welfare, the Constitution, and all other topics. To disagree with Maureen in any way is not only a sign of being wrong, it's a hallmark of pure evil...or at least membership in the NRA, which is pretty much the same thing.

6. It is usually possible and always desirable to name-drop and name-call in the same sentence.

7. The particulars of my consumer-driven, shamefully self-involved life reveal universal truths.


Explanation of the Dowd/Douglas connection: by Miss Marple- 2/11/03

Ms. Dowd was escorted around New York and DC for many months by one Michael Douglas of Hollywood fame and fortune. She got to go to all the best parties, was photographed for the tabloids, and was picking out a gown to wear at the Oscars. Of course, Michael had become interested in her during Clinton's impeachment, when she had written some very anti-Clinton columns. After a few weeks of the Michael treatment, she began to write anti-Starr, ant-Newt columns, ignoring Clinton.

Then Clinton was acquitted by the Senate. In an amazing coincidence, Michael Douglas dropped Ms. Dowd like a hot potato, and instead picked up a hot tomato, Catherin Zeta-Jones, who subsequently bore him a son and they were married.

Ms. Dowd cannot get over her tragic loss. Her columns are increasingly anti-Bush, in the hope of impressing her lost love, Michael.

In addition, we think she has a secret crush on the President and is trying to get him to pay attention to her. Ha!

2 posted on 05/28/2003 1:31:41 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
ping
3 posted on 05/28/2003 1:32:46 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Now I know where all FR's articles come from. For the past 2 hours or so I've been watching and reading article after column after article pop up, all posted by you. You're quite industrious. If this is a news forum, I guess someone's got to do the dirty work and actually post the articles. Good work. Do you do this every morning?
4 posted on 05/28/2003 1:35:10 AM PDT by ForOurFuture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


5 posted on 05/28/2003 1:40:50 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForOurFuture
Yes she does! And we're lucky to have her. Along with John Huang2, the bases are covered.
6 posted on 05/28/2003 1:44:38 AM PDT by Fracas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Blair is not a kid.
He is an adult.
7 posted on 05/28/2003 2:02:52 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is absolutely delicious. I don't want to get my hopes up too much, but wouldn't it be nice to see Dowd called for what she is, a distorter of the truth!

Thank you kattracks!
8 posted on 05/28/2003 2:10:04 AM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
And I thought she was doing it just because all Democrats are liars.
9 posted on 05/28/2003 2:12:20 AM PDT by Rome2000 (Convicted felons for Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Bingo!!

... And, hence responsible for his actions.

However, to be held to account is very much out of fashion in the United Staets ...

Example, what was that US Senate vote on Clinton?

10 posted on 05/28/2003 2:37:38 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I can understand other columnists reading Dowd because she's exotic, nutty fodder, always available if they can't think of something else to write about.

But it's beyond comprehension that a normal newspaper reader would waste time on her column.
11 posted on 05/28/2003 2:38:21 AM PDT by WaterDragon (America the beautiful, I love this nation of immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

it's about time this media whore got what she "EARNED"


12 posted on 05/28/2003 2:46:04 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Dogeggs.com
THE NEW YORK TIMES WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN NEWS

Editorial

Dice on the Dixie chicks getting naked. Page 51

NEW LATE CITY FINAL FIRST EDITION

All the news that`s fit for doody

Friday, April 25, 2003 / Weather: Partly day, partly night, Page 61
6 sense

President Gore closer to finding 911 terrorists

BY MAUREEN DOWD

NEW YORK - Although it`s only been almost two years since 911, President Al Gore today said that the US is getting closer and closer each day to finding those people responsible for 911. At a news conference today the President was asked about this tremendous progress and if it was possible that those responsible might have been in the planes when they crashed on Sept 11th. President Gore said that it was possible but it`s not quite probable yet if they were they only ones responsible. When asked if it was possible that those responsible might possibly be in Afghanistan as part of the Taliban, the President responded that it was possible that those responsible might be in Afghanistan as part of the Taliban but the US needs to be more responsible before that can be solvable. When asked if it was possible that he meant he was being responsible to remain hospitable to our valuble French allies, the President replied that he was being responsible to remain hospitable to our valuble French allies and he likes the name french fries.

Coming back from a fund raiser the President spoke at a fundraiser at a Hasidic community meeting. "I`ve always loved the Amish, and I can assure the Mennonite community that the world will be well protected from terrorist threats from around the globe." When asked if that protection also included the United States, the President responded that it was possible to protect the United States and we should all be responsible to keep an eye out for those who may be hostile. When referring to last weeks deadly VX nerve gas attacks in San Francisco that left 600,000 people dead, and last months dirty bomb atomic explosion that obliterated Berkley killing millions, the President confirmed that those individuals who were responsible will be held accountable, and it is possible that it will be most probable that they will be found. When one harsh individual asked about whether we should really care about losing Berkely since it was never a part of the United States to begin with, the President replied that "We all must be reponsible. Berkely was valuble and it was probable that the terrorist attacks can be solvable." When asked what he was going to do to step up precautions against terrorism, the President said he has increased funding to the EPA and that everyday we are cleaning up the fallout as well as taking better precautions against global warming. "Need I remind the people of the United States that although it is possible that we have probable terrorists who are hostile, we cannot be irresponsible when it comes to global warming. My fight for the enviornment will never cease, and it is for that reason alone why I chose to rip off the Energy Star logo that you find on your refrigerator. That means we all have to save energy, so I remind the American citizens to turn down their thermostats in their refrigerators and make sure that all your air conditioners are freon free.

Coming back from a fundraiser, the President appeared on Oprah last Tuesday which was being taped in Florida, the state that helped him win the election, and talked more in depth about his work for the enviornment. "Our forests are being cut down at an alarming rate, the ozone layer is looking like the bald spot on top of my head, urban development is out of control and the carbon emissions from so many cars are causing global warming. All these are the direct result of over-population and therefore we must absolutely keep ignoring over-population and keep on protesting the logging community, the depletion of the ozone layer, urban sprawl, and global warming." Oprah immediately went into her "black accent mode" and riled up the audience, "Y`all lets hear it for tha greatest President that eva wuuuuzzz boyz!" The crowd began screaming wildly cheering and cheering. Oprah then went on to talk about how close this country came to doom, how close "that guy" meaning G.W. Bush (I shudder at writing it`s name), came to being President and how it was so fortunate that the Supreme court did the right thing and ruled that "not have been punched at all chads" counted as a vote for Al Gore.(This was proven when an electron miscroscope magnified the chads at the atomic level and found that indeed some of the electrons of some of the atoms had moved, therefore qualifying as a vote for Al Gore). When Oprah also pointed out about how fortunate it was that the Supreme court also ruled that all votes for Bush were in fact for Gore because of the severly confusing election machines, saying that it wasn`t fair that people should understand the arrow concept, the President stared blankly at Oprah for a minute then said, "Oh yeah yeah..The arrow concept." Oprah then went on, "I mean who would have known that an arrow pointing to G.W.Bush was a vote for G.W.Bush? How many here would have known that?" said Oprah pointing at the audeince. None of the audience raised their hands. She then thanked everyone for keeping up the election protests, saying it was so close but because "of ya`ll" this mans Presidency is in a lock box ya`ll!" The crowd stomped it`s feet cheering wildly.


13 posted on 05/28/2003 3:05:21 AM PDT by metalboy (Hitlery is Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks Kattracks...looks like the paper is imploding. The misquote by Dowd regarding My President was not too smart in my book. Dowd is an idiot.

Red

14 posted on 05/28/2003 3:12:18 AM PDT by Conservative4Ever (life is but a dream...Sha Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm not a certified Timesologist, but I can't say I'm shocked by what's happening at the Newspaper of Record. I've been expecting a blowup since August, when The Times ran a front-page story misrepresenting Henry Kissinger's views on war with Iraq. A newspaper willing to lie so boldly in pursuit of its editorial agenda is a newspaper out of control.

Bears repeating. Again and again.

May Dowd meet her just fate, the old biddy liar.

15 posted on 05/28/2003 3:25:36 AM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Okay, I'm scraping my jaw off the floor. I can't believe this appeared in the NY Daily News. Thanks for the post, kattracks.
16 posted on 05/28/2003 3:26:40 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Justice" for the Dowdy one - fantastic!
17 posted on 05/28/2003 3:30:27 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
NY Crimes Meltdown Bump.
18 posted on 05/28/2003 3:45:15 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Imus is talking about Dowdy's article NOW!!! She's going to get CREAMED!!
19 posted on 05/28/2003 3:49:33 AM PDT by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Claire Voyant
Imus is talking about Dowdy's article NOW!!! She's going to get CREAMED!!

I heard it too. If the NY Times doesn't FIRE Maureen Dowd then Jayson Blair, in his book, can claim that the Times is racist. No special treatment for white NY Times writers, especially if they have been close to Howell Raines' zipper.

20 posted on 05/28/2003 3:55:15 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (He Who Laughs Last Was Too Dumb To Figure out the Joke First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson