[Ready4Freddy]

So what's the difference you imply? You would be innocent, but this man is not?

[laredo44]

So what's the difference you imply? You would be innocent, but this man is not?

A trial won't establish whether Scott is innocent or guilty, only whether the prosecution can prove its case.

[Claire Voyant]

I see you are a LAWYER......does this mean you can explain, with a straight face, why Scott had $10,000.00, a totally different look and his BROTHER'S PASSPORT on him??? NO ONE carries someone else's passport unless they are about to flee.

Also, MOST...MOST of the time it's the SPOUSE that murders...not a stranger. I'm sure they told you that in Law School.

[DB]

Do you think Peterson is innocent?

Do you think his lawyers will lie and trash other innocent people to get him off regardless if he's guilty or not?

And you really believe that is an attorneys job and is what an ethical attorney should do?

I suppose you think OJ didn't do it because the jury didn't convict?

Peterson is absolutely entitled to a fair trial. He's not entitled to have his lawyer make a mockery of truth and justice.