Sorry, that one won't fly with me. The 'Clinton technique', as you choose to call it, is simply known as good crisis management in other circles (see Johnson & Johnson and the Tylenol scare for the classic example of how to do it, see Nixon and Watergate for the classic example of how not to do it).
That approach makes sense when the information involved is bound to come out anyway - little of what we've heard so far re: Scott & Amber is of that nature, since it'll be inadmissable in court. Or are you saying that it's a premptive strike against what the defense thinks the prosecution and / or Amber faction will disclose via leaks?
"If you're saying that Scott Peterson isn't telling the truth to his own attorneys, I'll buy that."
If you're suggesting that Scott remembers all 69 calls that the MPD monitored / logged, much less the hundreds of other calls that they must have taped, I won't buy that.
Absolutely.
If you're suggesting that Scott remembers all 69 calls that the MPD monitored / logged, much less the hundreds of other calls that they must have taped, I won't buy that.
I'm saying that if it's true that Scott Peterson had a secret checking account and he didn't tell his attorney about it, then Mark Geragos finally has the client he deserves.