Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laci's hubby spent secret cash on lovers
New York Daily News ^ | 5/28/03 | MARY PAPENFUSS in Modesto, Calif. and MAKI BECKER in New York

Posted on 05/28/2003 1:14:59 AM PDT by kattracks

With as many as three girlfriends, multiple cell phones to stay in touch and a checking account hidden from his wife, Scott Peterson had a busy secret life, a source close to the double-murder investigation revealed.

Investigators also have evidence that Peterson - accused of killing his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, named Conner - made a "significant purchase" of items that could have been used to anchor a body, a second source familiar with the case said.

Investigators need to find the items to "connect all the dots," that source said.

The bodies of Laci and Conner washed ashore last month in San Francisco Bay, near where Scott Peterson, 30, had told cops he went fishing Christmas Eve. He reported his 27-year-old wife missing after returning that night.

Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, has proclaimed his innocence. His lawyer, Mark Geragos, has vowed to help him find the real killer.

Lawyer Gloria Allred, representing Peterson's admitted mistress, Amber Frey, urged any other girlfriends to step forward yesterday. Allred also met with prosecutors to discuss their plans to call Frey as a witness, possibly during a preliminary hearing scheduled for July 16.

Peterson, who is being held without bond, showed up in court yesterday aslawyers wrangled over an array of issues, from unsealing document towiretaps.

His bleach blond locks had been shorn to a near-buzz cut that was back to his original dark brown. He said nothing, appearing confident and sometimes flashing a smug grin as the legal eagles duked it out.

Judge Al Girolami heard arguments from California newspapers that want sealed documents - including search warrants and autopsy results - to be made public. He said he would rule this week.

Girolami also threatened to issue a gag order. "Every day we hear about something in the paper that we don't hear in court," he said. "I think we need a protective order."

The judge ordered prosecutors to give Peterson's camp copies of 69 phone conversations that law enforcement intercepted between the defendant and his lawyers in the months before his arrest.

Details of those conversations were disclosed Monday on Fox News Channel, which reported that Peterson told Frey in one conversation: "I know who did it, and I'll tell you later when I see you." That meeting never occurred.

Defense sources have raised the possibility that Laci Peterson was killed as part of a satanic ritual or by a strange man spotted in the neighborhood the day she disappeared.

After the court proceedings, Geragos said the defense team has received several helpful tips from the public that the police also are looking into.

"The big cases tend to bring out the big nuts," he conceded, "but a lot of information we have received has been very good."

Originally published on May 28, 2003



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armchairlegalexpert; avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: Ready4Freddy
Geraldo only repeats what Geragos tells him. He's a parrot, not to mention a useful idiot.
141 posted on 05/28/2003 6:23:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Not to mention the fact that as soon as you even name him a suspect, he lawyers up.
142 posted on 05/28/2003 6:23:55 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"In fact, I do. As we all know, he may well be found "not guilty" as a result of stunts his attorney pulls; that won't mean he's INNOCENT though, will it?"

Again, not what I asked. I asked whether or not you though that the source of his attorney's fee payments had a bearing on his guilt or innocence, not whether it would have a result on the results of the trial. I try, at least, to phrase my questions clearly and concisely, Howlin. Read them at face value, rather than imbuing them with other meanings, OK?

143 posted on 05/28/2003 6:28:19 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Now you're putting words in my mouth, Howlin.

Are these or are these not YOUR very words?

To: Howlin

"I'm betting they have a lot we don't know about."

All gathered recently, after the arrest, apparently. Othrwise he'd have already been arrested, what?

"I'd personally like to know who is paying him."

Do you have reason to believe that it's not the parents? Do you believe that the source of payment has any bearing on his guilt or innocence?

125 posted on 05/28/2003 9:02 PM EDT by Ready4Freddy

144 posted on 05/28/2003 6:28:32 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Not to mention that he might further incriminate himself while he's running around free; he might make a stupid mistake; he might confess to someone.
145 posted on 05/28/2003 6:29:14 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
If that is correct, 'splain me why they would not have arrested him upon acquiring such evidence.

I think we've presented very plausible, reasonable, common sense reasons why the MPD waited as long as possible before arresting him, don't you think?

146 posted on 05/28/2003 6:32:02 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Parsing, parsing, parsing.

No matter what the outcome is, he will NOT be PROVEN "innocent;" he may be found "not guilty," but that doesn't mean he IS innocent.

Your question was do I believe that the source of his money has any affect on whether he will be found guilty or innocent; as I stated before, yes, I do. Big money almost always guarantees a better defense, and if you were honest, you'd admit that. If he didn't have access to a high profile attorney, he won't be able to "beat the rap" the way they are trying to.

147 posted on 05/28/2003 6:33:28 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Exactly. But what do *we* know.......LOL.
148 posted on 05/28/2003 6:33:57 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Not to mention the fact that as soon as you even name him a suspect, he lawyers up."

Can't think of many things more foolish than not hiring an attorney if one is named as a suspect in a murder case, Howlin.

But I digress - who was Scott's attorney before the PD was assigned?

149 posted on 05/28/2003 6:34:02 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Your question was do I believe that the source of his money has any affect on whether he will be found guilty or innocent;"

That was not my question, Howlin.

150 posted on 05/28/2003 6:35:39 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Can't think of many things more foolish than not hiring an attorney if one is named as a suspect in a murder case, Howlin.

Which is another reason why you avoid naming your suspect as a "suspect" or arresting him for as long as possible. You want your suspect to be on his own as long as possible, in the hope that he'll aid your case by making a blunder.

151 posted on 05/28/2003 6:37:10 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Actually, no, I don't.
152 posted on 05/28/2003 6:37:26 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; All
Greg Deselms (guest on FNC), who is the WebMaster of Laci's site, is crossing over to do a new Scott Peterson web site!!

Greg is worried that the appearance of guilt, might not give Scott a "fair trial".

He's had "so many requests" he's almost decided to do the Scott Peterson Web site...duhhh.

Wonder how much Geragos is going to pay this guy?

sw

153 posted on 05/28/2003 6:38:46 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife (That's Show-Biz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
"You want your suspect to be on his own as long as possible, in the hope that he'll aid your case by making a blunder."

So, how was that Law & Order marathon on Monday? :>)

154 posted on 05/28/2003 6:39:10 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Was it you?
155 posted on 05/28/2003 6:39:42 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Is he the guy from the Red Lion Inn?
156 posted on 05/28/2003 6:40:46 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Oh, look; he's mocking us.

Two words: defense attorney.
157 posted on 05/28/2003 6:41:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Why the hell not? Why would you arrest someone as soon as you thought you had the "smoking gun" (which may turn out not to be the case), and then have him assert his right to a speedy trial, which would give you less time to make your case airtight? Barring his being a flight risk or a continuing danger to the community, why would you rush to arrest someone? Why is having time to develop your case NOT a plausible reason to delay arrest? Since you don't know any more than anyone else what they have and we're reduced to speculation, it may as well be reasonable speculation.
158 posted on 05/28/2003 6:43:22 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
My information came from a real attorney who posts here on this forum.
159 posted on 05/28/2003 6:44:46 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
What I can't figure out is IF Scotty is innocent, why wouldn't HE want a speedy trial so he can get out of jail sooner?

Why would an innocent man be willing to sit in jail for 2 or 3 years?
160 posted on 05/28/2003 6:45:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson