Skip to comments.
Laci's hubby spent
secret cash on lovers
New York Daily News ^
| 5/28/03
| MARY PAPENFUSS in Modesto, Calif. and MAKI BECKER in New York
Posted on 05/28/2003 1:14:59 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
To: Ready4Freddy
Geraldo only repeats what Geragos tells him. He's a parrot, not to mention a useful idiot.
141
posted on
05/28/2003 6:23:15 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: wimpycat
Not to mention the fact that as soon as you even name him a suspect, he lawyers up.
142
posted on
05/28/2003 6:23:55 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
"
In fact, I do. As we all know, he may well be found "not guilty" as a result of stunts his attorney pulls; that won't mean he's INNOCENT though, will it?"
Again, not what I asked. I asked whether or not you though that the source of his attorney's fee payments had a bearing on his guilt or innocence, not whether it would have a result on the results of the trial. I try, at least, to phrase my questions clearly and concisely, Howlin. Read them at face value, rather than imbuing them with other meanings, OK?
To: Ready4Freddy
Now you're putting words in my mouth, Howlin. Are these or are these not YOUR very words?
To: Howlin
"I'm betting they have a lot we don't know about."
All gathered recently, after the arrest, apparently. Othrwise he'd have already been arrested, what?
"I'd personally like to know who is paying him."
Do you have reason to believe that it's not the parents? Do you believe that the source of payment has any bearing on his guilt or innocence?
125 posted on 05/28/2003 9:02 PM EDT by Ready4Freddy
144
posted on
05/28/2003 6:28:32 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Not to mention that he might further incriminate himself while he's running around free; he might make a stupid mistake; he might confess to someone.
145
posted on
05/28/2003 6:29:14 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: Ready4Freddy
If that is correct, 'splain me why they would not have arrested him upon acquiring such evidence. I think we've presented very plausible, reasonable, common sense reasons why the MPD waited as long as possible before arresting him, don't you think?
146
posted on
05/28/2003 6:32:02 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: Ready4Freddy
Parsing, parsing, parsing.
No matter what the outcome is, he will NOT be PROVEN "innocent;" he may be found "not guilty," but that doesn't mean he IS innocent.
Your question was do I believe that the source of his money has any affect on whether he will be found guilty or innocent; as I stated before, yes, I do. Big money almost always guarantees a better defense, and if you were honest, you'd admit that. If he didn't have access to a high profile attorney, he won't be able to "beat the rap" the way they are trying to.
147
posted on
05/28/2003 6:33:28 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: wimpycat
Exactly. But what do *we* know.......LOL.
148
posted on
05/28/2003 6:33:57 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
"
Not to mention the fact that as soon as you even name him a suspect, he lawyers up."
Can't think of many things more foolish than not hiring an attorney if one is named as a suspect in a murder case, Howlin.
But I digress - who was Scott's attorney before the PD was assigned?
To: Howlin
"
Your question was do I believe that the source of his money has any affect on whether he will be found guilty or innocent;"
That was not my question, Howlin.
To: Ready4Freddy
Can't think of many things more foolish than not hiring an attorney if one is named as a suspect in a murder case, Howlin. Which is another reason why you avoid naming your suspect as a "suspect" or arresting him for as long as possible. You want your suspect to be on his own as long as possible, in the hope that he'll aid your case by making a blunder.
151
posted on
05/28/2003 6:37:10 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: wimpycat
Actually, no, I don't.
To: Howlin; All
Greg Deselms (guest on FNC), who is the WebMaster of Laci's site, is crossing over to do a new Scott Peterson web site!!
Greg is worried that the appearance of guilt, might not give Scott a "fair trial".
He's had "so many requests" he's almost decided to do the Scott Peterson Web site...duhhh.
Wonder how much Geragos is going to pay this guy?
sw
153
posted on
05/28/2003 6:38:46 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife (That's Show-Biz!)
To: wimpycat
"
You want your suspect to be on his own as long as possible, in the hope that he'll aid your case by making a blunder."
So, how was that Law & Order marathon on Monday? :>)
To: Ready4Freddy
Was it you?
155
posted on
05/28/2003 6:39:42 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: spectre
Is he the guy from the Red Lion Inn?
156
posted on
05/28/2003 6:40:46 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: wimpycat
Oh, look; he's mocking us.
Two words: defense attorney.
157
posted on
05/28/2003 6:41:21 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Ready4Freddy
Why the hell not? Why would you arrest someone as soon as you thought you had the "smoking gun" (which may turn out not to be the case), and then have him assert his right to a speedy trial, which would give you less time to make your case airtight? Barring his being a flight risk or a continuing danger to the community, why would you rush to arrest someone? Why is having time to develop your case NOT a plausible reason to delay arrest? Since you don't know any more than anyone else what they have and we're reduced to speculation, it may as well be reasonable speculation.
158
posted on
05/28/2003 6:43:22 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: Ready4Freddy
My information came from a real attorney who posts here on this forum.
159
posted on
05/28/2003 6:44:46 PM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: wimpycat
What I can't figure out is IF Scotty is innocent, why wouldn't HE want a speedy trial so he can get out of jail sooner?
Why would an innocent man be willing to sit in jail for 2 or 3 years?
160
posted on
05/28/2003 6:45:24 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson