Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: haole
"......generals steered clear of the project, and designers, free from meddling senior officers, created the ultimate ground-support airplane."

This is a good formula for success in any project, military or otherwise. Keep the gubmint out of the designer's hair and let them come up with something that works.

The F111 was the best example of how NOT to build a military airplane. Ol' never-made-a-mistake-in-his-life Robert McNamara just wouldn't leave the project alone, so the result was an airplane which was originally supposed to do everything that couldn't do anything really well. The last use I saw them being put to was back in the late 60s where they had volleyball nets attached to their vertical stabilizers in 'Nam.

The way they fly the A-10 reminds me of my crop-dusting days. Much the same techniques are used. I hope the Army takes them over or acquires a second generation of them. They can do so much better than a helicopter which is so limited in speed.

12 posted on 05/27/2003 5:06:29 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nightdriver
The F111 was the best example of how NOT to build a military airplane

It actually was a kind of test platform for things like side-looking radar. I seem to remember that it also had a little problem with parachutes not opening when the crew ejected.

I also read somewhere that the F111 was used in developing the F14. But it never did do all of the things it was originally commissioned to do.

41 posted on 05/27/2003 6:41:10 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson