Skip to comments.
Y Chromosomes Sketch New Outline of British History
NY Times ^
| May 27, 2003
| NICHOLAS WADE
Posted on 05/27/2003 3:49:55 PM PDT by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Some mighty interesting stuff in here...if you're interested in this sort of thing. I am and I know soem other Freepers are too.
1
posted on
05/27/2003 3:49:55 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
To: blam; aculeus; jennyp; PatrickHenry; thefactor
*Anthropology Ping* (and tell all your Celtic friends...)
2
posted on
05/27/2003 3:54:45 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: Pharmboy
Yes, it's an interesting article. And not all that surprising, really. The majority of the population at most times consisted of peasants and serfs, and there's no reason to think they would have all been killed or ousted when new conquerors moved in.
Some French historians of the annales school have pointed out that there's more continuity over the centuries when you look at peasants' huts and villages than there is in manors and castles, because invaders usually go after the manors and castles. The fighting takes place mainly within the fighting classes, which are the nobility and gentry. Peasants get killed, but there's no particular incentive to wipe them out as there would be with competing nobility.
3
posted on
05/27/2003 3:57:32 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Pharmboy
Genetic SPOTREP
To: Pharmboy
Wonderful!! More, please sir, more.
5
posted on
05/27/2003 4:04:40 PM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: Pharmboy
The Celtic inhabitants of Britain were real survivors. Nowhere were they entirely replaced by the invaders and they survive in high proportions, often 50 percent or more, throughout the British Isles ... Well of course they do.
Just Remember Andy Capp
He was never politically correct, but he sure was realistic.
So9
To: Cicero
majority of the population at most times consisted of peasants and serfs, and there's no reason to think they would have all been killed The 'serf' survival strategy is still with us today in the form of bureaucracies. The key to success is to never stand out amongst the rest ie the even hedge theory. Only the top level players win or lose.
7
posted on
05/27/2003 4:07:29 PM PDT
by
Snerfling
To: Servant of the Nine
To: Pharmboy
Good article , thanks.
" In a study two years ago Dr. Goldstein and colleagues established that Y chromosomes of Celtic populations were almost identical with those of the Basques.
Is anyone suprised?
My favorite theory is that most Europeans are descendents of the refugees from the flood of the Black Sea (Noah's Flood?) in 5,600BC.
Linguists have traced the origins of all the Indo-European languages to that region. (Traced mainly through words used by farmers)
However, Cheddar Man does not fit into that scheme.
9
posted on
05/27/2003 4:21:15 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Pharmboy
10
posted on
05/27/2003 4:25:32 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Pharmboy
Looks to me like those Celtic men had the last laugh. It also looks like they had an (understandable) hankering for those Scandanavian babes.
11
posted on
05/27/2003 4:26:04 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
To: Pharmboy
12
posted on
05/27/2003 4:28:11 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Pharmboy
Highly interesting and informative article. Please post more here, when you can.
I'd love to get my Y chromosomes tested.
13
posted on
05/27/2003 4:29:05 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Unions and Marxists say, " Workers of the world unite!")
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Pharmboy
15
posted on
05/27/2003 4:33:55 PM PDT
by
blam
To: MonroeDNA; Jim Robinson
I'd love to get my Y chromosomes tested. That might not be a bad business to start: "Get to know your origins, men! Give us a bit of your inside cheek (the scraping won't hurt a bit) and we'll tell you what's in your background! Perhaps a bit of a Dutchman or a Swede, an Italian or a Mede! A Slav, or a Jew, a Moor or Bantu!
I'm just being silly, but maybe we can start an internet Freeper business doing this--whatcha think, Jim?
16
posted on
05/27/2003 4:40:42 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: Servant of the Nine
And you do know, of course, that the Romans never fought in Ireland 'cause they feared those crazy Celts! ('Tis true!)
17
posted on
05/27/2003 4:42:18 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: Pharmboy
And you do know, of course, that the Romans never fought in Ireland 'cause they feared those crazy Celts! ('Tis true!) Well, it makes a good story. If the Romans had not had internal trouble they would have conquered the Picts and the Irish wouldn't have been far behind..
So9
To: Servant of the Nine
Another good story goes down for the truth (you sound like you know more about this than I do, mate).
19
posted on
05/27/2003 5:11:50 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: MadIvan
Brit bump!
20
posted on
05/27/2003 5:13:36 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson