Bad example. The answer to this one is "yes". As for why, why should I have my money confiscated to pay for the upkeep of a bridge I've never layed eyes on much less travelled across.
Bad example. The answer to this one is "yes". As for why, why should I have my money confiscated to pay for the upkeep of a bridge I've never layed eyes on much less travelled across.
Theoretically, the GGB District is self-supporting thru tolls. And it was, under its original charter & financing.. Like everything else in CA it is now a complete sham/fraud, violating all of our principles .
- The fact remains, without eminent domain the bridge and its approaches could never have been built. By all means, tell me a better, more constitutional way to build needed bridges & roads.
Somehow, our libertarian rhetoric always bogs down on the messy details of clearing land for a bridge approach, etc, -- at a unique geographical position.