Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
Vikings? Not Anglo-Saxons? I'm perfectly willing to believe that our common law owes a lot to common Germanic customs, but I find it kind of surprising if the Vikings in particular are the primary source of it. Got a source?
48 posted on 05/26/2003 9:41:18 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
"Vikings? Not Anglo-Saxons? I'm perfectly willing to believe that our common law owes a lot to common Germanic customs, but I find it kind of surprising if the Vikings in particular are the primary source of it. Got a source?"

The more accurate term might be "peninsular and island Northwest European" (call'em PINEs for short)--NOT "Germanic". When you start talking about Vikings vs. Anglo-Saxon, things get VERY intertwined as to which was the chicken and which the egg. Whether the Vikings were more the originators than the means of transmission and cross-fertilization, I'm not sure we will ever know.

Greece and Rome get "good press" because they HAD "the press" (i.e. a history based on writing rather than oral memory and tradition). I simply feel that the "PINEs" contribution to the Western cultural tradition of individual liberty and representative government is under-appreciated.

In the popular media of today, PINEs are depicted as dirty, bearskin-wearing, barbarians, (kind of the way Southerners are depicted--minus the bearskins) which recent archeological work has shown was most definitely NOT the case.

58 posted on 05/26/2003 10:10:11 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson