Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye Soccer Mom, Hello 'Security Mom' [and they are going GOP]
Time ^ | May 25, 2003 | Karen Tumulty

Posted on 05/25/2003 7:58:04 PM PDT by ewing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last
To: AlGone2001
Good point, the Democrats will always lose in that debate..
121 posted on 05/27/2003 2:02:26 PM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
I personally think it was the men's vote in '92 that lost that election. Lots of normally GOP men voted for Perot, and Bush lost the election. My husband was one of those men, and a lot of the men that I worked with voted for Perot.

I voted for Bush.
122 posted on 05/27/2003 2:06:25 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
You said what I was thinking, but a lot better than me. It was the men that got Clinton elected in the '92 election. Most of the republican women stayed the course, and voted for Bush.
123 posted on 05/27/2003 2:10:17 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Our current President is a real man.
124 posted on 05/27/2003 2:11:08 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: glory
I don't appreciate anyone.....male or female.....cavalierly talking about giving up MY right to vote because some women vote stupidly.

Some men vote without thinking too....in fact MOST men vote without the thought that I put into it, and I don't hear anyone talking about disenfranchising them.

Until that discussion is in play (or you are willing to advocate that blacks be disenfranchised because their voting record is worse than women) the discussion of women not voting is not only pointless, but decidedly unAmerican.

The debates taking place nearly a century ago about women's suffrage are of a different era, and in that sense also irrelevant to the discussion.

What we need to do is educate women to understand that the ideals of Conservatism are what will serve them best.......not engage in silly discussions about taking their (our) rights away.

125 posted on 05/27/2003 2:11:11 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
Correct, it goes both ways..Perot bamboozled the male GOP faction in 1992 much like Clinton seduced the soccer moms in 1996. (and the Nader faction helped take down Gore in 2000-both sexes)
126 posted on 05/27/2003 2:13:04 PM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
Exactly......using statistics about women's voting as a scapegoat for the reality that many conservative men jumped ship and allowed the election of the debauched one is inexcusable, IMO.

You can use statistics to support any position you want to, and in this case, the position is indefensible.

As I said, the lesson to be learned from this is that women (and men) need to be educated to understand that Conservative values are what make America strong, and that THIS President will defend those values far more effectively than any liberal will.

127 posted on 05/27/2003 2:17:22 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson