I did a search and did not find it posted
1 posted on
05/25/2003 12:58:58 PM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Kaslin
This is great. While people are finding billions in gold and cash, thousands of bodies in mass graves and the UN give a 14-0 vote on letting Britian and US agencies run the courntry for a year, the RATS think we did it all wrong.
Can you say 60 seats in the senate!!
2 posted on
05/25/2003 1:02:49 PM PDT by
q_an_a
To: Kaslin
Meet the Press, scene of the crime.
3 posted on
05/25/2003 1:02:51 PM PDT by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: Kaslin
Luckily, there are fewer people who care what the democrats think.
Did he hype it? Lets change that question a little. Was Saddam Hussein a threat to innocent human beings? Yes and he had proven it a million times over. Did he have those chem and bio weapons? Are they there now? I could care less. We did the right thing.
4 posted on
05/25/2003 1:05:59 PM PDT by
milan
To: Kaslin
I do believe if the only thing we did was free the children from the childrens Prison, then there was no hype at all but all truth about what Saddam and sons were.
Give Bush credit for ending the evil there and the rats be damned!
6 posted on
05/25/2003 1:10:26 PM PDT by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: Kaslin
JOE Biden, Do you mean to tell me that You think Mr. Bush was not truthfull and you are pissed?
Dear Joe ,you were not pissed when billy clinton bombed innocent people afer lying about genocide
7 posted on
05/25/2003 1:11:19 PM PDT by
South Dakota
(Just so you know, I'm saddened that daschle and McGovern are from my state)
To: Kaslin
The Democrats would wait for the nuclear explosion to happen before believing that we should do something. It is better to act on credible threats than on absolute devastation.
Is it "hype" to find that worst-case scenarios didn't come to be, while "likely" scenarios still remain true? I don't think so.
-PJ
To: Kaslin
I always expected the information regarding WMd to onlu come out after the Rats begin accusing.
11 posted on
05/25/2003 1:21:12 PM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Kaslin
I have trouble deciding who is the bigger blow-hard, Biden or Byrd.
To: Kaslin; Miss Marple; Howlin
They can't be this stupid..
13 posted on
05/25/2003 1:23:37 PM PDT by
Dog
(LOST: Beloved Pet answers to the name QUAGMIRE if found call Howell Raines lost since Afghanistan.)
To: Kaslin
To the LIB RATS-->
KOSOVO Clean up your own poop pile before creating new ones!
15 posted on
05/25/2003 1:24:59 PM PDT by
ALS
("We are the president." Hillary Clinton)
To: Kaslin
Joe Biden of Delaware
Jay Rockefeller of West VirginiaLiars Extrordinaire!
18 posted on
05/25/2003 1:28:45 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(Blessed are those who hunger and thirst, for they are sticking to their diets.)
To: Kaslin
Gee, what did these two incomparable idiots, Biden and Rockefeller, think that Saddamn was going to do with Dr. Germ, Mrs. Anthrax, mobile labs, atropine injectors, NBC suits...etc.?
%$#&*!#%$
20 posted on
05/25/2003 1:39:29 PM PDT by
mewzilla
To: Kaslin
Bush has a habit of coming up with the goods right AFTER the dems stout spouting off about it.
In fact, he seems to do it so often I wonder if it is his strategy (after seeing what the presstitutes did to his dad)
22 posted on
05/25/2003 1:50:00 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(I'm formidable with that)
To: Kaslin
Of course, the Clintoon Aspirin Factory attack demonstrated the necessary intelligence and fore thought that is the hall mark of an outstanding military engagement.
Wag the Dog! How interesting that Hollywierd should produce this film, ostensibly to diss the "pubbies" but end up stickin' a finger in their own eye!! I guess they learned the "Hand Salute" maneuver with their thumb stickin' out!
To: Kaslin
LOL! The 'Rats keep digging their hole deeper. The more they verbalize this crap the higher GWB's ratings go and the smaller will be the 2005 Democrat presence in the Senate and the House.
26 posted on
05/25/2003 1:56:58 PM PDT by
jimkress
To: Kaslin
Failure to find Saddam proves he never existed
-- Six weeks after the invasion of Iraq, Pentagon officials are quietly beginning to acknowledge that their failure to find Saddam Hussein may be proof that the Iraqi leader never existed.
"We hate to admit it," said one unnamed official, "One of our main reasons for going in there was regime change. You know...overthrow a brutal dictator who tortured his own people. But at this point, we're not sure there ever was a Saddam Hussein. After all, if we don't have him dead or alive...who's to say?"
The military official said that the statues, murals and videos of Saddam Hussein are "circumstantial evidence which don't prove anything."
"I try to look on the bright side," he added. "Maybe we'll luck out and find a few chemical weapons so the war won't have been a total waste."
Experts agree that evidence of actual atrocities against Iraqis lacks the news value that potential atrocities against Westerners would have.
28 posted on
05/25/2003 1:59:33 PM PDT by
South40
To: Mitchell; Badabing Badaboom; Fred Mertz; oceanview; birdwoman; bonfire; riri
The administration's strategy has been brilliantly planned. In a rational universe, the Dems would screaming out loud over the apparent failure to locate Saddam Hussein. We have one pissed-off, sadistic, vengeful dictator on the lam with nothing to lose -- supposedly -- and he knows where those WMDs are cached. Scary sh*t, right? Bush should be called on the carpet to explain. But, noooo, the dems in their infinite wisdom want to play up the angle that Saddam wasn't a threat, and obsess over the "failure" to get bin Laden, who is probably dead, never had WMDs, and is certainly in no position to threaten us today. Meanwhile, the chances are that the election is going to come around with no follow-up to 9/11, gas under $1 a gallon, and Saddam Hussein safely removed from the world stage. Bush has played the Dems for the chumps they are.
29 posted on
05/25/2003 2:02:33 PM PDT by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Good post.
I hope the dimwits use this as ~shot in the buttocks~ number 9,000.
31 posted on
05/25/2003 2:18:09 PM PDT by
OpusatFR
(Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
To: Kaslin
Look at it from the dems point of view. They were trained during Willie's term to know that when the President points over there, it means that the President is involved in sleazy, criminal activity over here and they better start lying about it.
They know that Bush is a straight arrow but can't let go of the old sewer dweller habits. When Biden speaks, I can just hear Homer Simpson saying, "Hey, what's going on?"
34 posted on
05/25/2003 2:25:20 PM PDT by
Tacis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson