Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to send 20,000 additional troops to stabilize Iraq
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM ^ | 25 May 03

Posted on 05/25/2003 11:34:04 AM PDT by SLB

The United States plans to increase its military force in Iraq in an effort to stabilize the country.

U.S. officials said nearly 20,000 troops would arrive in Iraq over the next few weeks. This would increase the U.S. force level to about 163,000 troops. Currently, about 145,000 U.S. soldiers are deployed in Iraq.

U.S. troops have disarmed a militia group affiliated with pro-American Iraqi politician Ahmed Chalabi, as part of a campaign to impose law and order in Iraq, a political official said Sunday.

But fighters of the biggest Muslim Shi'ite group, trained by Washington's bitter foe Iran, reacted warily to the U.S. military's June 14 ultimatum for Iraqis to surrender their weapons.

Parts of Iraq were plunged into chaos after U.S.-led forces toppled president Saddam Hussein last month, and some Iraqis complain that crime has reached unprecedented levels. Gen. Peter Pace, deputy chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the additional troops would come from the 1st Armored Division, Middle East Newsline reported.

The U.S. military dissolved the Free Iraq Forces (FIF) and disarmed its fighters, said Entifadh Qanbar, spokesman for Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress.

The FIF, with fewer than 700 fighters and armed with assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, had been working under U.S. command.

Pace said the arrival of the armored division would represent the peak force level of the U.S. military in Iraq.

"The number is being increased as we speak by about 18,000 with the arrival of the 1st Armored Division," Pace told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday. "And then beyond that, there are no current projected deployments."

The United States has been joined by 20,000 British troops in Iraq. Washington has been discussing the contribution of other allies to the stabilization effort in Iraq.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; deployed; iraq; postwariraq; stabilizationforce; toldyouso
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Aaron0617
Why??

Its been 6 weeks. Why haven't the U.S. or the Coalition hired enough Iraqi Police.

Why not have our soldiers trained more police Or convert Iraqi soldiers to be policemen to do this? All with a minimal force of U.S. forces to watch them.

21 posted on 05/25/2003 5:46:20 PM PDT by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
new water mains are being layed just down the street, each segment is about 20 feet long, 5 feet tall and 8 feet wide.

I can't picture two scruffy looking Iraqi kids wandering off with one

22 posted on 05/25/2003 5:48:20 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All
Differant troops for differant missions. These guys are more than likely Military Police.
23 posted on 05/25/2003 5:49:30 PM PDT by Terp (Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aaron0617
Why haven't the U.S. or the Coalition hired enough Iraqi Police.

We were hoping that we were going to capture enough drafted Iraqi soldiers to train for these positions. But many were forced to fight to the death or see their families killed by the Fedayeen Saddam, and others went AWOL and changed clothes to civilian so they couldn't be identified.

Also, the Iraqi people were resistent to having the actual police force that had brutalized them for years being put back in power. Only those, like traffic cops and lower eschelon cops they didn't have grudges against were allowed to go back into uniform without the populus protesting.

The Brits coming and the new Americans coming are M.P. types with policing experience, and the Brits will be training the new Iraqi police force.

24 posted on 05/25/2003 6:04:06 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Were the generating plants destroyed? No followup on the report as to why it is taking so long to restore power,

The Iraqi equipment for their utilities is falling to pieces due to lack of updating parts over the last decades, diverting money to build palaces instead.

What isn't well reported is that most of the utilities were running at 50% efficiency BEFORE the Iraq War, due to jerryrigging unrepaired and unreplaced equipment and infrastructure. In many places now our efforts to provide water and electricity equal or exceed pre-WAR performance.

25 posted on 05/25/2003 6:10:21 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Any bets that Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki and the fired Secretary of the Army Tom White are snickering and saying "Told you so?"

No, actually.

There is no political mileage to be had here. Personally, I support 10 Million troops being deployed to Iraq. Until we reach that number, all bets are off. I want to see an additional 10 carrier groups created and deployed. Nothing less than complete subjugation of the jihadists will satisfy me. 20,000 troops? Let's not talk peanuts.

26 posted on 05/25/2003 6:17:03 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Franks wanted to bring another division in via the Northern border, to have a Northern front and also the extra troops to make shock deeper and surrenders more likely. But the Turks nixed that part of the plan.

The backup plan had the Kurds and CIA run the Northern front but it gave Franks less boots on the ground than he would have prefered for control and mop-up. At first, it appeared that the lesser number might work out in spite of everything, but with the criminal control problems and the bad press, the original number of troops in the original plan was seen to be necessary.

Wars are like that. You deal with the reality and fix what didn't go perfectly.

27 posted on 05/25/2003 6:18:46 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I suspect it's a prelude to the stabilization of Iraq.. </sarcasm>

Once in a while, things really are that which they appear to be..
28 posted on 05/25/2003 6:32:41 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SLB
20,000 will still not get them to Shinseki's proposal. In any case, the current war plan always allowed for increasing strength levels in the face of need. However, I believe that Shinseki's intent had always been honorable. If we permit a climate where a general gets shunned for offering his own experienced opinion, then we have made a mistake.
29 posted on 05/25/2003 9:57:59 PM PDT by RockBassCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy; madfly; Tancredo Fan
"They...like we...need to seal the borders..."

Bush and friends can find all the money and the troops in the world to secure another country's borders.

30 posted on 05/26/2003 4:25:02 AM PDT by 4Freedom (America is no longer the *Land of Opportunity*, it*s the *Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists*!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
My thoughts exactly...or at least heightened "extra-curricular" activities...
31 posted on 05/26/2003 6:47:25 PM PDT by alethia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
It is absolutely deliberate. I'm sure it's being facilitated by Ba'ath party members and Iranian backed groups...
32 posted on 05/26/2003 6:51:03 PM PDT by alethia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
why it is taking so long to restore power My question also. Maybe more sabotage than they anticipated.
33 posted on 05/26/2003 8:36:37 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
He also said several years. Let us hope he is wrong.
34 posted on 05/26/2003 8:38:09 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
but we have to do better before things really do become a problem over there

Too late.

35 posted on 05/26/2003 8:41:00 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SLB
I suspect we are sending another 20,000 troops to stablize Syria. Iraq already is neutered.
36 posted on 05/27/2003 7:46:28 AM PDT by American in Israel (Right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
He is probably right on that one. Our troop deployments are like "The Hotel California"- we can check out, but we can never leave.
37 posted on 05/27/2003 4:50:28 PM PDT by csmusaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
I kind of hope that we are putting enough troops in so that they can be massed at the right points quickly. My son is in Baghdad, and I feel he would be safer out in the field. Even scouting is safer than patrolling a city loaded with small arms.
38 posted on 05/27/2003 5:44:38 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I am sure your son is pretty safe, the US Military is the best in the world. More people die in Chicago from armed robberys than will die in Bagdad in the same period of time. Your son is safer in Bagdad!
39 posted on 05/27/2003 9:23:12 PM PDT by American in Israel (Right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Well, I am sure that the average inhabitant of Baghdad is in no greater danger than the average American citizen in the projects. But policing such a place is a dangerous business, especially when the unit has to be dispersed. He has a lot of confidence in his platoon sgt. and his gunner, both of whom are vets of the '91 campaign. Accept for one guy, the rest of his platoon is pretty squared away. His CO is also reliable. His equipment is old, some of the humvees 20 years old, and he expects to leave it in Iraq. Lot of OJT. Hope the hiring of the old NYPD commissioner will do some good.
40 posted on 05/27/2003 9:52:02 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson