[Conservative Me]

First, look at the title...

Then, ask yourself if Worldnet Daily would even cover the story if they didn't think it didn't have something to do with Christian rights specifically...

The mention of the city ordinance was brief, and, imo, was treated as if it were the town's excuse for not letting the man have his sign...as if the real issue was that he was Christian, and Bedford is anti-Christian.

It's comical.

[gdc61]

i was born and raised in bedford . it not anti-christian.

[milan]

You're missing the point! He DID break the ordinances I am sure.

The point is that no one is defending him, becuase he is a Christian. Does that mean Bedford is anti-Christian? No. If the sign said "gay" the ACLU would take the case. If the sign broke the ordinances, regardless of it saying "gay", the city council would ask for it to be removed. Would the city council be anti-gay? No. The article and I do not believe anyone is anti-Christian...accept the ACLU. The ACLU always takes these cases...unless it involves Christ...then it's "freedom of speech has time, place and manner restrictions." Yeah, right.

"Bush is Hitler", etc. I don't see any time, place, and manner restrictions on that.