Replies

Thanks for the insighful response...... your comment

"There is one subject that Hillary does not hold back on and that is Homeland Security and its funding"

is still confusing to me. I know she's a strong advocate - but god only knows what direction she'd move.

I've asked many times, only cause I'm ignorant and REALLY don't know...... but......... what is her position on illegal (and legal - the bad ones) immigrants? And on tightening our borders? I've not read or heard much about her positions there. Any insight??

And by the way, speaking of character, I think she was doing her things while Bill was playing with his ladies for 20 plus years, She was a vibrant young lady. I doubt she took a vow of celabicy. I suspect that will be disclosed. A primary factor in Bush's election was to restore a sense of character and morals to the White House. Because she is female should not blind us to those issues, any more than as it was so apparent, and important in the public's reaction with Bill. Gore lost on Bill's character - not cause of a stiff body, some Buddist funds, and some audible sighs.

The history of "Homeland Security" started in spring of 2001.

HART/RUDMAN chaired a study regarding terrorism/security of this nation. Newt was one of about 15 who undertook this study that was released in spring of 2001 prior to 9/11.

The study among other things recommended three things, Defense Department, State Department and Newts idea an new "Homeland Security Agency. "Rummy" has gone through .ell over the bottom up review of the Defense Department and until 9/11 was on the "hate" list of much of congress and media.

The State Department still untouched and of recent words of ire to Newt for bringing up their unaccountability and connections with the UN unaccountable dealings and "rip-off" of Iraq with its "Oil for Food" program which they reaped untold billions.

Initially President Bush rejected the idea of a new agency "Homeland Security" and then the liberals taking of the Senate with the "JUMPING JEFFORDS" of socialist Vermont decided to take up forming a new agency. I have heard that the lying Lieberman is taking credit for this new agency's birth.

President Bush stood firm against "UNION" special status with reorganinzing all these agencies under the Homeland Security Agency and took it to the people in last fall's election and regained control of the Senate.

Before the Congress went on break good old boy Lott was called to the White HOuse to get that legislation passed before the new Congress came in after the break.

The liberal were so humilitated at not only loss of Senate but that they lost their demand for "UNION" special status that they decided that Homeland Security and its funding would be what they went after President Bush on.

In the midst of the Lott babel, and the liberal reaction with an all out assult of him stepping down, there was on Fox News somebody from the liberal party on an early morning program and I do not remember who it was but they stated that the DIMS would be using Homeland Security and its funding against President Bush.

What happened next was with the forming of the new "AGENCY", Congress themselves decided who "individually" would receive the money. President Bush spoke publically about how Congress had tied his hand with the funding because it was not sent to the Agency but to who the Congress decided individually.

So Hillary has been itching ever since Jan. 2003 about President Bush not looking out for Homeland Security, while she herself sent millions to specific people in New York for gas masks.

The request for money from the President was to coordinate the "first responders" throughout the nation, and what Congress did (I hold the sleeping republicans responsible for letting this happen) was to keep the funds from this Agency to do this.

Tiny Tom gave an interesting trashing of the President not funding Homeland Security speech to "UNIONS" from local, county, and state conference.

So all that these liberal have done and said the only thing left unsaid is that in order for all these accusations to have merit is for another terrorist attack to happen so this lying low life bunch can say "WE TOLD YOU SO"!

I've asked many times, only cause I'm ignorant and REALLY don't know...... but......... what is her position on illegal (and legal - the bad ones) immigrants

She made her position clear in the run-up to her Presidential re-election campaign in 1996: illegal immigrants are welcome, as long as they know for whom to vote.

By the way, the Constitution restricts one to serve no more than two terms as POTUSA. She's had her run (remember "We are the President", "two for one", ad nauseum).