Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 300winmag
I honestly doubt that Hillary! can beat Bush, even in New York. She's just too divisive a figure. And let us not forget that if Bush wins every state that he won in 2000, he will win in 2004--by a wider margin.
22 posted on 05/25/2003 6:44:42 AM PDT by dufekin (Peace HAS COME AT LONG LAST to the tortured people of Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: dufekin
I honestly doubt that Hillary! can beat Bush, even in New York. She's just too divisive a figure. And let us not forget that if Bush wins every state that he won in 2000, he will win in 2004--by a wider margin.

Oh, I agree she knows that the RATs chances of winning in 2004 are slim-to-none. But she may make herself the VICE-presidential candidate in 2004 just to hear the adulation, and smooth the way for being on the top of the ticket in 2008. She could claim the defeat was solely due to the guy at the top of the ticket, and not her, because she's really adored by everybody. Besides, we should all feel sorry for her that she lost, and vote for her as president in 2008. It wasn't her fault.

Besides, Hitlery ran half the government as just a presidential housewife. Bill and Hitlery would have been calling the shots if Algore had won. She would do quite well as vice-president, and de-facto czarina.

26 posted on 05/25/2003 7:31:38 AM PDT by 300winmag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: dufekin
"I honestly doubt that Hillary! can beat Bush, even in New York. She's just too divisive a figure. And let us not forget that if Bush wins every state that he won in 2000, he will win in 2004--by a wider margin."

My only fear would be well-planned and audaciously executed voter fraud on a massive scale in enough urban areas to tip big electoral-vote states into Hillary's column. That is the only way I can see her winning the presidency. I don't think enough has been done to prevent such voter fraud. We all saw SD Senatorial voter fraud, after all. This is the only thing about 2004 or 2008 that makes me uneasy. Don't understand why Bush has not pressed harder for genuine reform in this area. Granted, any voter-reform action would have to be very carefully designed because rats are ready to take any changes in the system and game them to their advantage just as they have the present system.

38 posted on 05/25/2003 11:05:58 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson