Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nana4bush
LOL!
8 posted on 05/24/2003 8:27:27 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin; nana4bush
This is what I thought would happen after that stupid meeting. Naive lower echelon people probably thought that something would change.

They are now beginning to see that the meeting was nothing but show, and now they are madder than they were before. Leaks a-plenty will start appearing over the next few weeks.

I am STILL convinced that there is something criminal that we are not seeing. Why wouldn't they assist in the prosecution of Blair for fraud? You would think if they were the victims they would like to really dump all the blame on him by making him a criminal.

But they put the quash on that idea right away. They didn't hold some talks with the prosecutor...they simply refused, basing it on First Amendment rights. That makes no sense at all, unless you are looking for a virtuous way to avoid having the feds investigate and discovering something else.

9 posted on 05/24/2003 8:36:33 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson