Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-N.Y. Times scribe likens self to Malvo
World Net Daily ^ | 5-24-04 | WND

Posted on 05/24/2003 6:08:50 PM PDT by cgk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2003 6:08:50 PM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk

Both are as good as dead anyway, either professionally or literally.

2 posted on 05/24/2003 6:12:02 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
This guy is nuttier than a fruitcake!!
3 posted on 05/24/2003 6:14:34 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Now that's an interesting analogy!

So who was Jayson Blair's "play daddy"?

4 posted on 05/24/2003 6:17:53 PM PDT by Loyalist (Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
I think, by the time Blair or anybody else knew much about Malvo, Blair's reporting about the sniper case was essentially over.
5 posted on 05/24/2003 6:18:09 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
I wonder why liberals of all stripes always feel that "rage" and "anger" are somehow virtuous? They always feel "rage" and it's so holy and justifiable. Just because the dude is black (or medium brown, really) he gets to feel all this "rage" and it justifies all his stupid, dishonest, repellent behavior?
I used to live in Eugene - the ultimate liberal town - and I saw bumper stickers that went something like this:
"If you're not angry you're not paying attention" and
"Don't trust anyone who isn't enraged".
Liberalism is actually a serious mental illness.

Fortunately it's curable.
6 posted on 05/24/2003 6:20:49 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
I thought this wasn't a racial thing. Or maybe he's planning on running in a Democrat primary, and needs to practice his lines.
7 posted on 05/24/2003 6:23:36 PM PDT by Bernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
This guy is nuttier than a fruitcake!!

I agree, but I have to admit it sure feels good to see this psycho bend the Times over and stick it to them. Nothing this guy can do can be anything near what this propaganda rag deserves.

8 posted on 05/24/2003 6:23:50 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Nutty as a fruitcake. But he has my full support in exposing the inner workings of the Old Gay Laddie.
9 posted on 05/24/2003 6:24:20 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; cgk; Joy Angela
...I say again...

...just like I've been asking all through the Sniper Attacks on people walking outside around the D.C., Maryland and Virgina Area =

...Why were these Snipings, and now the bogus scarey New York Times Articles about them, occurring just as Voters were getting ready to stand in Election 2002 Voting Lines at the Polls..?
(Or Not..?)
10 posted on 05/24/2003 6:26:02 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
How can I possibly find what he says credible? I enjoy seeing the NYT squirm but Blair is no bearer of Truth.
11 posted on 05/24/2003 6:31:51 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgk
This just in:
The NEW YORK TIMES has found a replacement to fill the standard of excellence they are known for:

"YES SIR MR RAINES, I'LL GET RIGHT ON IT!!!"

12 posted on 05/24/2003 6:34:00 PM PDT by Vetnet ("WHO'S NEXT?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
Well ... I do agree the NYT deserves all the bad publicity Jayson is giving them - the fact he's making the assertion that he was doing it on purpose just doesn't seem to fit. I think he's using it as a ploy to cover up all his errors and faked stories.

Maybe he was really playing them, but I just have a hard time believing that.
13 posted on 05/24/2003 6:36:22 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
How can I possibly find what he says credible?

If he writes a book, the publisher's lawyers will require supporting evidence to protect themselves from libel suits.

14 posted on 05/24/2003 6:40:20 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vetnet
This just in: The NEW YORK TIMES has found a replacement to fill the standard of excellence they are known for: "YES SIR MR RAINES, I'LL GET RIGHT ON IT!!!"

ROTFL

15 posted on 05/24/2003 6:43:34 PM PDT by darkwing104
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
They can't read his mind.He sickens me.I blame the whole scandal on Raines but that doesn't make me want to elevate Blair.I'd like other newspapers to stop treating the NYT as a reliable source.
16 posted on 05/24/2003 6:48:11 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Maybe he was really playing them, but I just have a hard time believing that.

You're right, there's no way he was playing them like he's letting on. He's just frantically trying to engage in CYA, and he's completely oblivious to the fact he's WAY overplaying his part.

But it sure is amusing to watch him so clumsily use the tools and techniques of the race demagogoues against the oh-so-polically correct and righteous New York Times. It's even more amusing to see the Times refusing to engage Blair directly because they're paralyzed by their own terror of appearing to be "insensitive." Jayson Blair and the New York Times deserve each other - they're both equally despicable.

17 posted on 05/24/2003 6:48:56 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
"they're both equally despicable"

Now that I can agree with!!
18 posted on 05/24/2003 6:56:02 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
This situation reminds me of Al Sharpton saying to Tim Russert on Meet the Press, "I'll respond to your questions about [Tawana Brawley, etc.], after you force Bill Clinton and Hillary to answer questions about their misdeeds." Actually, Blair could be a press secretary for Sharpton.
19 posted on 05/24/2003 6:58:25 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
Sharpton doesn't need anyone because he's so good at the big lie! The DNC might be able to use him.
20 posted on 05/24/2003 7:07:05 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson