To: Dog Gone
While important, it's not a WMD...of course it is. Is the missle a toy or a vehicle for sight seeing? If it weren't a WMD why did they hide it?
4 posted on
05/24/2003 4:45:31 PM PDT by
RWG
To: RWG
Plans for the surface-to-surface missile were one of the regime's most closely-guarded secrets and were unknown to United Nations weapons inspectors Technically, they found plans for a smoking gun. This article may be reaching a bit far.
5 posted on
05/24/2003 4:49:41 PM PDT by
Cagey
To: RWG
It's just the terminology - people are equating WMD with barrels of toxic chemicals, or warheads filled with toxic chemicals. They forget, the chems are no good without a delivery system.
7 posted on
05/24/2003 4:58:45 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: RWG
Is the missle a toy or a vehicle for sight seeing? If it weren't a WMD why did they hide it? If you'll read the story carefully, they hadn't even built it yet.
A weapon of mass destruction is considered to be a nuke, chemicals, or a biological weapon. Not a missile. Keep in mind that the Iraqis who volunteered this information denied that it was going to carry a WMD.
I don't see any basis for characterizing this as a WMD. Where am I wrong?
12 posted on
05/24/2003 5:12:39 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson