Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joyce11111
A good prosecutor will get the jury to see that actions and behaviors mean things.

If Scott was innocent, and his wife was abducted by chain-smoking Satanists in a brown van, then how can the defense explain 1000 of Scaughty's behaviors since she went missing?

Why did the grieving husband not allow anyone in the home? Why did he immediately mop the previously mopped floors, vacuum, take umbrellas in a tarp to storage, have missing cement anchors, sell Laci's car and jewelry within weeks, omit all this for two weeks to his bimbo, laugh at Laci's vigil, dye his hair and carry his brother's passport, speak of her in the past tense immediately, not remember the bait he had fished with the day before, and so many other suspicious things?

If anyone else killed Laci and happened to throw her into the bay 2 hours from her home on the same day that Scott happened to be fishing there, why is he doing all of the above?

46 posted on 05/24/2003 10:14:47 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle
Yes--Scott's refusal to let the police rifle through his possessions w/o a warrant can possibly be called "claiming his 4th Amendment rights", but Scott's refusal to let Sharon, Ron, or Amy into the master bedroom CANNOT be explained by any such thing. And I hope the jury notices.
50 posted on 05/24/2003 10:32:07 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson