To: Howlin; MaggieMay
"I'm backing the police on this one."
Then your being foolish... Again, from the article the police arn't disputing what these folks say, and there will be records. They would also, under normal circumstances, have to undergo a lie detector test...
131 posted on
05/24/2003 4:37:32 PM PDT by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: babygene
Again, from the article the police arn't disputing what these folks sayIt's not their job to refute every utterance from a raving lunatic like Mark Geragos.
132 posted on
05/24/2003 4:42:31 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: babygene; Howlin; runningbear
Babygene I am not sure if you read my post #115. In it I stated that there was NO search at the park that day(if I am wrong someone,please correct me). So how could Homar have a conversation with policeman conducting a search New Year's Day and what he had seen, when there was NO police search that day in the park. Right there his story does not check out. As far as police not deneying his story, according to Prosecutor Goold they are not going to get into saying why they are discrediting certain sightings, it would compromise evidence in the case.
If I am wrong please feel free to correct me.
139 posted on
05/24/2003 5:21:21 PM PDT by
MaggieMay
(A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson