Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
Even thirty years ago, when I was flying penetration exercises against it, NORAD had become useless against the air-breather threat. We had to come in at high altitude, for instance, because otherwise NORAD couldn't see us at all.

Which is why I suspect it doesn't really matter which way they were looking on 9/11.

7 posted on 05/24/2003 6:16:12 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grut
I suspect it doesn't really matter which way they were looking on 9/11.

I suspect you are correct. As an Air Traffic Controller of over 20 years, my perception of what could have been done with the WTC aircraft is grim. In the time it takes to humanly recognize the nature of an incident like this, it is over. The idea to shoot down any aircraft that has a communication failure, loses its transponder or behaves erratically for a few minutes would mean the downing of a dozen aircraft every day.

If NORAD was set up to monitor all the daily flights for erratic behavior, it would have a staff nearly as large as the FAA, and the results would be the same or worse. Worse being the complications that arise with overlapping duties or missions.

The true cure for this, sadly, is removal of the privilege (or right) for private citizens to fly aircraft. Id est, fewer planes means closer monitoring and restrictions on routes and proceedures. This could be coupled with mandatory public motorized mass transportation, etc., etc. In short, how far do we restrict our freedoms to be "absolutely" safe?

11 posted on 05/24/2003 6:40:59 AM PDT by Thommas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson